05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

question, therefore, between the Christian theological idealist <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Christian cosmo-thetical idealist is, really, whether God operates through<br />

phenomena, grouped simply by His causative will according to fixed laws,<br />

or, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, through objective substances in which attributes<br />

actually inhere; whether He operates upon our mind in producing<br />

impressions we connect with a supposed external world "immediately" or<br />

"mediately." It has been said by great philosophers, who rejected the<br />

former species of idealism, that though no man can believe it, no man can<br />

confute it; <strong>and</strong> it is claimed by its advocates that it never has been confuted.<br />

That no man can believe it, is certainly not true. We have the same<br />

evidence that confessedly deep thinkers have believed it that we have that<br />

men believe any other doctrine. But if the deepest thinking of some of the<br />

deepest thinkers can reach such a theory, where shall we place the<br />

crudities of the popular philosophy or want of philosophy? How little can<br />

it settle by its speculations.<br />

Transcendental Idealism,--Kant.<br />

<strong>The</strong> school of "transcendental idealism," if it be proper to call it<br />

"idealism" at all, has its greatest modern representative in Kant <strong>and</strong> it is<br />

said, "Kant cannot, strictly speaking, be called an idealist, inasmuch as he<br />

accepts objects outside of the Ego, which furnish the material for ideas, a<br />

material to which the Ego, in accordance with primary laws, merely gives<br />

form.” 525 <strong>The</strong> weakness of Kant's system was its arbitrary separation<br />

between the practical <strong>and</strong> the speculative. He held that the data of<br />

perception are valid in the practical sphere both of thought <strong>and</strong> action, but<br />

cannot be accepted as proven, <strong>and</strong> therefore valid, in the sphere of<br />

speculation. <strong>The</strong> practical here reached a result which transcended the<br />

powers of the speculative. To the speculative it was not, indeed, disproven,<br />

but only non-proven; yet, as non-proven, it made his system one which<br />

admitted, on one side, the speculative possibility of the purest idealism,<br />

while on the other, at the sacrifice of internal consistency, he reached for<br />

himself a hypothetical realism, or cosmo-thetical idealism. All speculative<br />

thinking in Germany since has, more or less, turned upon the vindication<br />

525 Fürtmaier: Philosoph. Real Lexicon. Augsburg, 1854, Idealismus.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!