05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lood themselves. Calvin's is the communion of an absent body <strong>and</strong> blood;<br />

Paul's the communion of a present body <strong>and</strong> blood, so present that bread,<br />

broken <strong>and</strong> given, imparts the one, <strong>and</strong> the cup, blessed <strong>and</strong> taken, imparts<br />

the other. Calvin talks of a faith by which we spiritually eat an absent body,<br />

Paul of elements by which we sacramentally eat a present body.<br />

As by Zwingli's theory, so by Calvin's also, the argument of the<br />

Apostle here is emptied of all force. For the argument of the Apostle is<br />

addressed to those who eat <strong>and</strong> drink unworthily, that is to those who had<br />

not faith. <strong>The</strong> very necessity of the argument arises from the presupposition<br />

of a want of true faith in the Lord, on the part of those to whom it was<br />

addressed. But on the Calvinistic theory the communion of the body <strong>and</strong><br />

blood of Christ, <strong>and</strong> participation in them, are confined to those who have<br />

faith. <strong>The</strong>se Corinthians, therefore, had St. Paul taught them a theory like<br />

that of Calvin, might have replied: "Oh, no! as we are without true faith,<br />

<strong>and</strong> are receiving unworthily, we receive nothing but bread <strong>and</strong> wine, but<br />

as bread <strong>and</strong> wine were not the sacrifices which Christ offered to God, we<br />

do not come into fellowship with God's altar by partaking of them-therefore<br />

we are not guilty of what you charge on us, to wit, the<br />

inconsistency of eating <strong>and</strong> drinking at the same time, of the sacrifices<br />

offered on God's altar, <strong>and</strong> of the sacrifices offered on the altar of<br />

Demons." <strong>The</strong> Calvinistic theory makes the argument of the Apostle an<br />

absurdity.<br />

Two parallels in the connection help to bring out very vividly the<br />

Apostle's idea. One is the parallel with Israel: v. 18. "Behold Israel after<br />

the flesh: are not they which eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar?"<br />

<strong>The</strong> point seems to be most clearly this: that the communion of the body of<br />

Christ in the Supper is as real as the eating of the animal sacrifices in the<br />

Jewish Church. Christ's body is the true sacrifice which takes once for all<br />

the place of the Jewish sacrifices, <strong>and</strong> the sacramental communion, in<br />

which that body is the sustenance, in ever-renewing application of the one<br />

only sacrifice, takes the place of the Jewish eating of the sacrifice. <strong>The</strong><br />

other parallel

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!