05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

are rather fond of it than otherwise, to the best of their knowledge <strong>and</strong><br />

belief. We have not proposed to ourselves a general review of Dr. Shedd's<br />

book, but simply to look at it with reference to its statements in regard to<br />

our own Church. Nevertheless, we cannot avoid an allusion to what<br />

strikes us an extreme statement in apparent conflict with sound <strong>The</strong>ology.<br />

It is in his declaration that "sin is in the strictest sense a creature." “<strong>The</strong><br />

original act of self-will is strictly creative from nothing." Dr. Shedd here<br />

seems to labor to show that he is not speaking in a popular <strong>and</strong> rhetorical<br />

way, but that over against such a style of language, he wishes to be<br />

understood rigidly--sin is a creature--but God is not its creator. Man is as<br />

really <strong>and</strong> as strictly a creator as God is--<strong>and</strong> sin is his creature. Such<br />

language, if pressed, seems inconsistent with the nature of God, of man, of<br />

sin, <strong>and</strong> of creature. It denies that God is the alone Creator of all things; it<br />

maintains, almost after a Manichean style, that evil is a primal principle <strong>and</strong><br />

that a man is the Ahriman of it; it makes sin an objective reality, not the<br />

condition or act of a subject, <strong>and</strong> elevates the mutilation <strong>and</strong> disease of the<br />

creature to a rank in being with the creature itself. No more than the<br />

surgeon creates by cutting off the leg of a man, does man create sin by a<br />

self-originated destruction of his original righteousness, on which follows<br />

that inordinate state of the natural reason <strong>and</strong> appetites which theologians<br />

call concupiscence. <strong>The</strong> impulse to theft, to lying, to impurity, is not a<br />

substance, not a creature, but is the result of inordinate desire in which selflove<br />

now unchecked by original righteousness <strong>and</strong> kindled by the fomes of<br />

the self-corrupted will, reveals itself It is not a creature, but a moral<br />

phenomenon of the creature--desire <strong>and</strong> purpose are not creatures, but<br />

exercises of the faculties of the creature. If sin be strictly a creature, it must<br />

be the creature of God, <strong>and</strong> this part of Dr. Shedd's theory really would<br />

make God the author of sin, an inference, which, we are sure, no one could<br />

more earnestly resist than himself. <strong>The</strong> finite will can corrupt the creatures,<br />

but it cannot add to them.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!