05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of." Hence they draw the inference that our Saviour means: "This [bread]<br />

[represents, is a symbol of] My body." Because then it is to be a symbol of<br />

His broken body, He breaks this bread, <strong>and</strong> because it is to be a symbol of<br />

His body given, He gives this bread, <strong>and</strong> because it is to be a symbol of<br />

His body taken, they take this bread--<strong>and</strong> what then?--because it is to be a<br />

symbol of His body eaten, they eat this bread. <strong>The</strong> symbol does not help<br />

its friends very far nor very long.<br />

We have shown, that the laws of language forbid the application of<br />

the symbol here, even if the words in the abstract would allow of it. We<br />

now go farther, <strong>and</strong> maintain that the word "is" cannot have the sense of<br />

"signify or be a symbol of." Taking the two terms as convertible, as they<br />

have always been taken in this controversy by those who defend them; we<br />

prove this: 373<br />

1. By the fact that no translations, ancient or modern, with any<br />

pretension to character, so render the word. We assert, after a careful<br />

examination of all of those that have most reputation, that not one so<br />

translates the word, whether they originate in the Eastern, Western,<br />

Lutheran, or Reformed Churches. No man of character has ever dared to<br />

insert into the text of his translation: This is a symbol of My body. Where<br />

such terms as "means," "amounts to," or "signifies are used, though a<br />

superficial reader might imagine that they are substituted for "is," they are<br />

really designed to express an idea involved in the predicate. This use of<br />

them rests on the fact that "is" always means "is." Twice two amount to<br />

four means that twice two are four. Leo signifies lion, means that Leo is<br />

lion. But we can neither say twice two signify four, nor Leo amounts to<br />

lion, still less that twice two are a symbol of four, or Leo is a symbol of a<br />

lion.<br />

373 Zwingli (De Vera et Falsa Relig. Opera, Turici., 1832. III. 257, 258): "This signifies (significat) My body...This<br />

thing, to wit, which I offer you to eat, is the symbol (symbolum est) of My body...This which I now comm<strong>and</strong> you<br />

to eat <strong>and</strong> drink shall be to you a symbol (symbolum erit)...As often as ye eat this symbolic bread (panem<br />

symbolicum)"--<strong>and</strong> so innumerably. "To be a symbol of," or "to signify" in the sense of "be a symbol of," is the<br />

characteristic, fixed Zwinglian interpretation of the word "is."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!