05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ead inhere in the bread, <strong>and</strong> all the attributes of Christ's body inhere in<br />

His body: the reason of this inherence is not arbitrary; but bread has its<br />

qualities because it is bread, <strong>and</strong> body has its qualities because it is body;<br />

bread cannot have the qualities of body because it is not body, <strong>and</strong> body<br />

cannot have the qualities of bread because it is not bread; <strong>and</strong> the<br />

phenomena by which the mind recognizes the presence of bread <strong>and</strong> body<br />

correspond with the qualities of each, so that the real phenomenal<br />

evidences of bread are proofs of true bread, <strong>and</strong> the phenomenal evidences<br />

of body are proofs of true body. So far, then, it is clear that the doctrine of<br />

the true presence is in perfect accord with the sound metaphysic with<br />

which the doctrine of transubstantiation conflicts. But it will be urged that<br />

the difficulty remains that the phenomenal evidences of the presence of<br />

true body are wanting in the Supper, <strong>and</strong> that our doctrine is so far in<br />

conflict with the testimony of the senses, equally with the Romish. This<br />

difficulty, which has often been triumphantly urged, has really no force.<br />

<strong>The</strong> senses may be competent to decide on the presence <strong>and</strong> reality of<br />

what is offered to them, but may be incompetent to decide whether a thing<br />

is really present, which does not come within their sphere. That I see the<br />

furniture in my room is proof that there is furniture there; but that I do not<br />

see the air in my room is no proof that air is not there. That I see the bread<br />

in the Supper is proof that bread is there; but that I do not see the body is<br />

no proof that the body is not there. But, says the objector, if the body be<br />

there, it must be clothed with the essential attributes of body, such as<br />

visibility <strong>and</strong> tangibility. You would see it <strong>and</strong> touch it, if it were there, on<br />

your own principles that properties inhere in substance. <strong>The</strong> theological<br />

answer to this is, that this objection assumes the natural presence of a<br />

natural body per se, while the doctrine to which it professes to be an<br />

objection is, that there is a supernatural presence of a supernatural body<br />

through the divine, with which it is one person. <strong>The</strong> metaphysical answer<br />

is, that though the properties which become known phenomenally, inhere<br />

in substance, the same substance, under different conditions. exhibits<br />

different properties. I take a compound

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!