4IpaUJbnm

After carrying out of this inquiry, it could be concluded that the general response is
favorable, especially people with more than 50 years appreciate this view. As regards the
second question, younger respondents consider that the memory of the place is not very
important, although the weight of the "no" is not very expressive. People with more than 50
years stress the importance of local memory as highly valued with just 4 people responding
negatively. The most interesting insight comes from the third issue by stating that the
architecture could be perceived as a work of art. Aspects of intangible culture are also
valued by two age groups chosen for this analysis, but as regards the younger group, there is
almost a tie, in contrast to the older group, the answer was clearly affirmative.
The quest for the "Cultural Factor" will be a percentage, which in some situations will be
positive and negative, namely enjoying or belittling a particular building or street. The
question is the following: how much does the owner of a Heritage House, relative to the
market, values the home? What about the buyers? Apparently there will be a certain value
to add, but what we found out through some street interviews is that not always the
intangible cultural heritage (classified) becomes an asset. It may raise certain issues related
to selling, change, specific projects, and other situations.
After analyzing the summary of options for recovery or depreciation in order to put into the
formula of calculation, the "Culture Factor" has shown that people over the age of 50 years
understand and appreciate the importance of intangible culture and local memory. It
represents 20% of the value of existing work or building on that street. Are those 20%
corresponding to the concern demonstrated, in any amendment to existing buildings? As for
the younger group between 18 and 30 years, 76% believe that the culture and the
immaterial heritage associated with the memory of the place indicate 5% concern and
importance related to the intervention on the street where they inhabit. To find an average
by estimating the largest number of people in each group, this percentage will be 13%.
There is as well a 12% difference between the two choices of 5% and 20%, with regard to
the "Culture Factor".
There is also the "local memory". How much is it worth? Our interviews indicated that
people between 18 and 30 years old did not give much value to the memory and the
presence of a specific building in a given street, but on the contrary, people older than 50
years stressed this importance. Who evaluates a building or an intervention on a street, for
example, must respond to society when thinking of the constructive characteristics and
materials applied or to be applied, so that there is no "cultural rubbish". Avoiding other
people will not enjoy a particular well, just why there hasn't been a concern of project at the
level of importance that people have in place to intervene, nor an individual care as regards
local memory or intangible heritage.
Based on the previous calculation formula related to the market value of a particular
property, we consider the "crop factor" culture as a functional element designed for (Cc)
construction cost, on (Cp) cost of the project and (Ca) administrative and commercial costs,
since it will be reflected directly in these values, the application of the (Fc) "Culture
Factor"in conjunction with the other reductions the functional, physical assessments, or
even location. The costs related to fees and licenses are quantified in accordance with the
172