07.07.2016 Views

4IpaUJbnm

4IpaUJbnm

4IpaUJbnm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Given that SMEs were shaped by their home business environment, it may be reasonable to<br />

shift on studying HGFs at the regional level.<br />

All previously discussed studies have determined HGFs at a national level. This omission in<br />

the HGF literature was recognised by Brown and Mawson (2015) as well. Nevertheless,<br />

some scholars such as Almus (2002) and Bruderl and Preisendorfer (2000) understood the<br />

importance of regions. Recently, Mason et al. (2009) concluded that HGFs had a positive<br />

impact on employment growth at a regional scale. Contrary, Brown and Mawson (2015)<br />

contradicted that by investigating Scottish counties. They showed that employment growth<br />

was generated outside the region, therefore, did not create that many jobs and wealth<br />

within the area. These findings were at least partly confirmed by the recent study (Foreman-<br />

Peck & Nicholls, 2015) investigating relocation of firms within the nation. However, Brown<br />

and Mawson’s findings may be influenced by relatively small sample size and the period of<br />

unstable macroeconomic climate. Those trends may need to be further examined. As Brown<br />

and Mawson (2015, 16) recommended, the further study should ‘examine the nature,<br />

quality, durability and spatiality of the employment and spillovers created by these highly<br />

dynamic, entrepreneurial firms.’<br />

Job quality<br />

The recent review of job quality by Burchell et al. (2014) highlighted the lack of clear<br />

definition of job quality and inconsistent methodologies. Those varied from highly subjective<br />

workers’ evaluations (Staines & Quinn, 1979) to various matrices. For instance, two recent<br />

European studies (Koerner and Puch, 2011; Green, 2013) provided more sophisticated<br />

models. Green (2013) applied Green and Mostafa’s (2012) model particularly designed for<br />

the European Working Conditions Survey and compared EU nations. Nevertheless, given<br />

those surprising results (see Green and Mustafa, 2012) and unavailability of regional data,<br />

Koerner and Puch’s (2011) method may be more reasonable (see Figure 3). It is worth noting<br />

that some of the dimensions referred to the nation while others were firm specific.<br />

Figure 3. Koerner and Punch (2011:131) quality of employment - seven-layer model; translation taken from<br />

Burchell et al. (2014)<br />

264

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!