07.07.2016 Views

4IpaUJbnm

4IpaUJbnm

4IpaUJbnm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 4. Details of the respondents involved in the study.<br />

SEX (%) POSITION (%)<br />

Female Male Executive Administrative Other staff<br />

staff<br />

38% 62% 34% 13% 53%<br />

PERIOD OF SERVICE<br />

1–5 years 6–10 years 11–15 years 16–20 years 21–25 years 26 and more<br />

6% 25% 28% 34% 5% 2%<br />

Analysis of the literature helped to answer the question of what characteristics are typical for<br />

creativity-friendly environment. The study aimed at assessing organisational environment.<br />

Information was collected by measuring characteristics in a quantitative and qualitative<br />

manner. The respondents were given open-ended and closed-ended questions. Statements<br />

for closed-ended questions were selected based on the assumption that the environment<br />

consisted of a many different aspects, which were divided into subcategories. The<br />

questionnaire consisted of six blocks of closed-ended questions, aiming at finding out the<br />

following: how much respondents know about creativity; whether, in their opinion,<br />

employees respond positively to changes; whether their organisation allows for the free<br />

expression of creativity; whether their organisation has a favourable physical environment;<br />

what, in their opinion, assessment measures should be implemented to induce creative<br />

behaviour; whether the psychological climate in their organisation is favourable to sharing<br />

knowledge.<br />

Researchers Weisberg (1989), Sternberg and Lubart (1999) argue that the ability to act<br />

creatively requires information about objects and phenomena, individual work moments and<br />

methods of operation. The respondents were, therefore, asked to specify where and how<br />

they learned about creative thinking and its development. Most of the respondents learned a<br />

lot about creativity and creative thinking from personal work experience (36%) and<br />

communicating with colleagues (54%), but not from educational institutions (1%) (Table 5). It<br />

suggests that direct communication and work give the necessary knowledge to achieve<br />

objectives and results, while educational institutions do not put much emphasis on creativity<br />

yet.<br />

Table 5. Respondents’ responses about their knowledge on creativity.<br />

Where did you get information on or<br />

learn about creative thinking and the<br />

benefits it brings?<br />

A lot Much Average Little<br />

I didn’t<br />

get any<br />

At a higher education institution 0% 1% 20% 46% 33%<br />

From courses, seminars, lectures 25% 25% 14% 17% 19%<br />

By reading, self-studying 22% 23% 34% 10% 11%<br />

From conversations, discussions with<br />

colleagues<br />

13% 54% 17% 11% 5%<br />

From personal experience 31% 36% 28% 5% 0%<br />

Many researchers, including Ferrari, Cachia, Punie (2009) and Beghetto (2007), emphasise<br />

that the development of creativity is strongly influenced by the general context of the<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!