07.07.2016 Views

4IpaUJbnm

4IpaUJbnm

4IpaUJbnm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

135 (47.4 percent) students, the research participants, align their studies with work, while<br />

150 (52.6 percent) students do not work while studying. The average age – 20,6 year old<br />

individuals.<br />

Research methods:<br />

Analytical descriptive method was used when analysing the distinctive features of<br />

creativity and personality traits and the importance of personality traits to creative<br />

expression.<br />

Quantitative research was carried out when identifying the components of the student<br />

creativity and the distinctive features of personality traits using NEO FFI questionnaire<br />

(NEO Five Factor Inventory, Costa, Mc.Crae, 1992). The questionnaire consists of 60<br />

statements designed to measure five personality traits: The questionnaire consists of<br />

five subscales: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism and<br />

Openness. The statements were assessed using a 5 point Likert scale – from 0 ("strongly<br />

disagree“) to 4 ("completely agree“). The respondent chooses one option that best<br />

aligns with his/her view. F. C. Worrell, W. E. Cross (2004) describe every separate<br />

feature pointing out that extraversion covers such traits as sociability, activeness,<br />

positive emotionality. Neuroticism is defined in terms such as unwanted behaviour,<br />

negative emotions, anxiety and disturbing emotions (uneasiness, hostility, insecurity,<br />

guilt, etc.) Conscientiousness is defined in terms such as achieving goals, the ability to<br />

control impulsiveness, orderliness, self-discipline and the postponing of satisfaction<br />

until a later time. Agreeableness is described as caring for people, which is the<br />

manifestation of altruism, affection, compassion, calmness and maintaining relations.<br />

Openness is described as the ability to accept new ideas and experience, without giving<br />

the priority for practical things. The permission to use NEO FFI questionnaire was<br />

obtained from the Laboratory of Special Psychology of Vilnius University. Students'<br />

creativity was investigated using the Personality creativity questionnaire (Петрулис,<br />

1988). The questionnaire consists of 64 statements, which the respondent assessed by<br />

ticking "Yes" or "No". The results were analysed using 9 subscales: intuitiveness,<br />

fantasy, prone to creativity and innovation, flexibility, originality, criticism,<br />

inversiveness and childishness. Following theoretical "keys" of the Personality creativity<br />

questionnaire a general creative indicator was identified.<br />

Statistical method Statistical analysis methods were used to process the obtained data:<br />

descriptive statistics (statistical averages, standard deviations); Student's t criterion (to<br />

compare two independent samples) was used to identify differences in several<br />

independent populations. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used for statistical<br />

data analysis seeking to assess the interface of such major personality traits of the<br />

research participants as neuroticism, extraversion, consciousness, agreeableness and<br />

openness with the components of perceived creativity. The obtained results are<br />

considered statistically significant if they correspond to the significance level Statistical<br />

data analysis was carried out according to SPSS version 17.<br />

Theoretical substantiation of the interface between creativity and personality traits<br />

The concept of creativity in scientific literature is rather ambiguous due to its complexity<br />

and changes in it. Generally, researchers define creativity as the ability to create new,<br />

original, unexpected, quality and appropriate, that is, useful items that meet the provided<br />

requirements (Amabile, 1983 quoted by Tierner et al., 1999; Guilford 1950, 1968; Sternberg,<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!