08.06.2013 Views

K. This is the 1st working draft of vol. VI. It still ... - From Marx to Mao

K. This is the 1st working draft of vol. VI. It still ... - From Marx to Mao

K. This is the 1st working draft of vol. VI. It still ... - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM*<br />

April — June, !(#*<br />

FROM CHAPTER MARX I<br />

TO MAO<br />

IDEALISM AND MATERIALISM<br />

⋆<br />

1. THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN<br />

TWO ARMIES IN PHILOSOPHY<br />

The whole h<strong>is</strong><strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> philosophy <strong>is</strong> <strong>the</strong> h<strong>is</strong><strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> struggle<br />

and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> two mutually opposed schools <strong>of</strong> philosophy<br />

— ideal<strong>is</strong>m and material<strong>is</strong>m. All philosophical currents and<br />

schools are manifestations NOT <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se FOR two fundamental schools.<br />

All philosophical <strong>the</strong>ories have been created by men belonging<br />

<strong>to</strong> a definite social class. The ideas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se men have moreover<br />

been h<strong>is</strong><strong>to</strong>rically COMMERCIAL<br />

determined by a definite social ex<strong>is</strong>tence. All philosophical<br />

doctrines express <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> a definite social class and<br />

reflect <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> productive forces <strong>of</strong> society<br />

and <strong>the</strong> h<strong>is</strong><strong>to</strong>rical stage in men’s comprehension <strong>of</strong> nature. . . .<br />

The social origins DISTRIBUTION<br />

<strong>of</strong> ideal<strong>is</strong>m and material<strong>is</strong>m lie in a social<br />

structure marked by class contradictions. The earliest appearance<br />

<strong>of</strong> ideal<strong>is</strong>m was <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ignorance and superstition <strong>of</strong> savage<br />

and primitive man. Then, with <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> productive<br />

forces, and <strong>the</strong> ensuing development <strong>of</strong> scientific knowledge, it<br />

stands <strong>to</strong> reason that ideal<strong>is</strong>m should decline and be replaced by<br />

material<strong>is</strong>m. And yet, from ancient times <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> present, ideal<strong>is</strong>m<br />

* <strong>Th<strong>is</strong></strong> text includes about two thirds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first chapter, and about one fifth <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> first six sections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second chapter <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mao</strong>’s “Pien-Cheng-fa wei-wu-lun<br />

(chiang-shou ti-kang)” (“Dialectical Material<strong>is</strong>m — Notes for Lectures”), as publ<strong>is</strong>hed<br />

in Kang-chan ta-hsueh, Nos. 6, 7 and 8, April — June, 1938.<br />

263

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!