12.07.2013 Views

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

132 PHYTOSTEROLS, PHYTOSTANOLS AND THEIR ESTERS<br />

premating exposure period. Reproductive parameters (e.g. number <strong>of</strong> pregnant<br />

females, number <strong>of</strong> pups) and postnatal development (e.g. pup mortality, pup body<br />

weights) as well as sex organ weights and sex hormone levels were monitored in<br />

the F1 to F4 generations. The authors reported changes in testosterone plasma and<br />

testicular levels and relative uterine weights in some generations. However,<br />

changes were not consistent over generations, and, because <strong>of</strong> the single dose<br />

design, no dose–response effect could be detected. No effects on number or<br />

viability <strong>of</strong> pups or other overt signs <strong>of</strong> developmental toxicity were observed<br />

(Ryökkynen et al., 2005).<br />

2.3.4 Special studies on estrogenic activity<br />

The estrogenic activity <strong>of</strong> MPSS-SE was assessed in the immature rat<br />

uterotrophic assay. Doses <strong>of</strong> 0, 500, 1000 or 2500 mg MPSS-SE/kg bw were<br />

administered via gavage twice daily to 10 immature (19 days old) female rats<br />

(Crl:CD (SD)IGS BR VAF/Plus) for 4 consecutive days, yielding daily doses <strong>of</strong> 0,<br />

1000, 2000 and 5000 mg/kg bw. Ethinyl estradiol was used as a positive control.<br />

Body weight gains <strong>of</strong> animals in the 2000 and 5000 mg/kg bw per day groups were<br />

significantly reduced. Absolute and relative uterine weights were unaffected in<br />

treated animals compared with the negative control (Dearlove, 2000).<br />

2.4 Toxicological studies: Phytostanol esters<br />

A set <strong>of</strong> toxicity studies with phytostanol esters, conducted according to<br />

recent guidelines and under GLP conditions, was submitted to the Committee. The<br />

same data set was previously submitted to the USFDA together with human<br />

intervention studies. Based on these data, phytostanol esters in the USA gained the<br />

status <strong>of</strong> GRAS substances in 1999 (Food Master File 000626). 1 Results from these<br />

toxicological studies were also published in peer-reviewed journals (Slesinski et al.,<br />

1999; Turnbull et al., 1999a, 1999b, 1999c; Whittaker et al., 1999).<br />

Two types <strong>of</strong> test samples were investigated in the toxicological studies<br />

submitted: 1) wood-derived mixtures <strong>of</strong> phytostanol esters (WDPSE) (with a stanol<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> about 94% -sitostanol and about 6% campestanol) and 2)<br />

vegetable oil–derived mixtures <strong>of</strong> phytostanol esters (VODPSE) (with a stanol<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> about 68% -sitostanol and about 32% campestanol). If not indicated<br />

otherwise, studies discussed in this section were done with these two test materials.<br />

According to the sponsor, this range <strong>of</strong> phytostanol ester compositions represents<br />

the mixtures used commercially.<br />

2.4.1 Acute toxicity<br />

(a) Acute oral and dermal toxicity<br />

Both WDPSE and VODPSE were investigated for acute oral and dermal<br />

toxicity. Oral toxicity testing was carried out in compliance with OECD Test<br />

1 Information on GRAS for phytostanol esters is available online at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/<br />

dockets/dockets/95s0316/rpt0054_01.pdf.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!