12.07.2013 Views

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

192 STEVIOL GLYCOSIDES (addendum)<br />

weeks 8 and 12, although no dose–response relationship or histopathological<br />

changes in muscle or nervous system were found. This was attributed by the<br />

authors to the slightly smaller size <strong>of</strong> the animals in the group and was not<br />

considered to be treatment related. In the high-dose group, females showed<br />

statistically significantly reduced cage floor activity scores in week 8 only. Rearing<br />

activity was lower in females in week 8 <strong>of</strong> treatment, but no differences between<br />

test and control groups were seen in week 12. There was a dose-related decrease<br />

in body weight gains, which was significantly different from control at all doses in<br />

the males and at 25 000 and 50 000 mg/kg in the females. Terminal body weights<br />

did not differ significantly from controls in either sex. After day 4, no differences<br />

were seen in <strong>food</strong> consumption between test and control animals in all groups.<br />

Haemoglobin concentrations and reticulocyte counts were found to be statistically<br />

significantly lower in the 50 000 mg/kg diet group compared with controls on days<br />

46 and 89. No dose–response was observed. Compared with controls, females<br />

receiving 25 000 mg/kg or above showed significantly elevated prothrombin times.<br />

This was not considered to be treatment related. Plasma urea concentrations<br />

were significantly elevated in both sexes in the high-dose group compared with<br />

controls. Non-significant elevations were seen in the two lowest dose groups, and<br />

there was no apparent dose–response relationship. Absolute epididymal weights<br />

for males, ovary weights for females and heart and kidney weights for both sexes<br />

in the high-dose group were statistically significantly reduced compared with<br />

controls. Macropathology and histopathology revealed no apparent treatmentrelated<br />

effects. The authors considered that the decreased body weight gain was<br />

due to taste aversion and decreased caloric density <strong>of</strong> the diet (Stamp, 2006b; Curry<br />

& Roberts, 2008). The NOEL in this study was 50 000 mg rebaudioside A/kg in the<br />

feed or 1370 mg/kg bw per day in males and 1530 mg/kg bw per day in females<br />

when expressed as steviol.<br />

In another study conducted to OECD guidelines in accordance with GLP,<br />

rebaudioside A (purity 99.5%) was fed in the diet to groups <strong>of</strong> 20 male and 20 female<br />

Sprague-Dawley rats to produce target doses <strong>of</strong> 500, 1000 or 2000 mg/kg bw per<br />

day for 13 weeks. Dietary concentrations covered the ranges <strong>of</strong> 5000–10 000,<br />

10 000–19 000 and 19 000–36 000 mg/kg, respectively, and were adjusted weekly<br />

to achieve the target dose. Body weights and <strong>food</strong> consumption were recorded<br />

weekly, a functional observational battery and locomotor activity data were recorded<br />

during week 12 and blood samples were collected for haematology and<br />

serum chemistry during weeks 2 and 5. At termination, samples were taken for<br />

haematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis. Complete necropsies were performed,<br />

selected organs were weighed and selected tissues were examined<br />

microscopically from all animals in the control and high-dose groups. Decreased<br />

body weight gain was noted in males at the top dose <strong>of</strong> 2000 mg/kg bw per day,<br />

which the authors concluded was due to the lower caloric value <strong>of</strong> the diet. There<br />

were no other treatment-related observations. The NOEL was 2000 mg/kg bw per<br />

day (Nikiforov & Eapen, 2008).<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> other studies were available on steviol-related material <strong>of</strong><br />

unspecified composition, for which the administered dose <strong>of</strong> steviol could not be<br />

identified (Lee et al., 1979; Toskulkao et al., 1994a; Wood et al., 1996).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!