12.07.2013 Views

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 ETHYL LAUROYL ARGINATE<br />

The median time at which the Cmax <strong>of</strong> ethyl lauroyl arginate occurred<br />

increased with increasing dose level, indicating a rapid absorption (0.5 h) at<br />

40 mg/kg bw and a more prolonged absorption (3 h) at 320 mg/kg bw. Plasma<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> ethyl lauroyl arginate were below the limit <strong>of</strong> quantification<br />

by 8 h post-dosing in all animals at all dose levels. Plasma concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />

N -lauroyl-L-arginine at 8 h post-dosing were quantifiable in all animals at the 120<br />

and 320 mg/kg bw dose levels. The rate <strong>of</strong> systemic exposure to ethyl lauroyl<br />

arginate, as characterized by the Cmax ratios at each dose, was low and did not<br />

increase consistently with increasing dose. The extent <strong>of</strong> systemic exposure to ethyl<br />

lauroyl arginate, as characterized by the AUC8 ratios at each dose, could not be<br />

estimated owing to the small number <strong>of</strong> quantifiable samples, which was ascribed<br />

to the rapid hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> ethyl lauroyl arginate and N -lauroyl-L-arginine. The Cmax<br />

and AUC8 ratios <strong>of</strong> N -lauroyl-L-arginine increased by less than the proportionate<br />

dose increment over the dose range 40–320 mg/kg bw. The authors concluded that<br />

this suggested non-linear (dose-dependent) kinetics, as increasing the dose <strong>of</strong> ethyl<br />

lauroyl arginate above 40 mg/kg bw resulted in a lower systemic exposure than<br />

would be predicted from a linear relationship. Plasma concentrations <strong>of</strong> N -lauroyl-<br />

L-arginine were considerably higher than those <strong>of</strong> ethyl lauroyl arginate, indicating<br />

extensive conversion to N -lauroyl-L-arginine. The terminal rate constant and halflife<br />

could not be estimated from the available data for either ethyl lauroyl arginate<br />

or N -lauroyl-L-arginine for any animal, except for N -lauroyl-L-arginine in one male<br />

receiving 40 mg/kg bw, where k was 0.7123/h and t½ was 1 h.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> the different formulations at a dose level <strong>of</strong> 120 mg/kg bw are<br />

summarized in Table 2.<br />

Table 2. Pharmacokinetic parameters following different formulations <strong>of</strong> a<br />

single oral (gavage) dose <strong>of</strong> ethyl lauroyl arginate (120 mg/kg bw)<br />

administered to male rats<br />

Formulation Cmax (ng/ml) / Tmax (h) AUC8 (ng·h/ml)<br />

Propylene glycol/<br />

water<br />

Ethyl lauroyl arginate N -Lauroyl-Larginine<br />

1.23 ± 0.29 / 1 23.2 ± 2.5 /<br />

0.75<br />

Ethyl lauroyl<br />

arginate<br />

N -Lauroyl-Larginine<br />

– a 103 ± 8<br />

Glycerol/water 9.42 ± 3.54 / 0.75 28.8 ± 4.6 / 1 12.6 ± 4.5 115 ± 18<br />

Water 10.6 ± 6.4 / 0.75 31.2 ± 6.4 / 0.5 8.78 ± 2.12 109 ± 10<br />

a Could not be calculated owing to the small number <strong>of</strong> quantifiable samples.<br />

Absorption <strong>of</strong> ethyl lauroyl arginate was rapid, as indicated by the Cmax values<br />

at 0.75–1 h. Plasma concentrations <strong>of</strong> ethyl lauroyl arginate were below the limit <strong>of</strong><br />

quantification (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!