12.07.2013 Views

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

222 SULFITES: ASSESSMENT OF DIETARY EXPOSURE<br />

In its last <strong>evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> sulfites at the fifty-first meeting, the Committee noted<br />

that potential dietary exposures based on maximum levels (MLs) 1 proposed in the<br />

draft Codex General Standard for Food Additives (GSFA) and on national mean<br />

<strong>food</strong> consumption data exceeded the ADI in the three Member States that submitted<br />

such data. Six Member States also submitted data in which dietary exposure was<br />

assessed on the basis <strong>of</strong> MLs in their national regulations and on mean <strong>food</strong><br />

consumptions; mean potential dietary exposure <strong>of</strong> consumers <strong>of</strong> <strong>food</strong> containing<br />

sulfites did not exceed the ADI. The potential for high-percentile consumers <strong>of</strong> <strong>food</strong>s<br />

containing sulfites to exceed the ADI was shown to exist, but available data were<br />

insufficient to estimate the number <strong>of</strong> such consumers or the magnitude and<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> intake greater than the ADI.<br />

A review <strong>of</strong> all permitted <strong>food</strong> <strong>additives</strong> was undertaken as part <strong>of</strong> the review<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Australian Food Standards Code (Australia New Zealand Food Authority,<br />

2002; Food Standards Australia New Zealand, 2006). Within this review, sulfites<br />

were identified as a cause for health concern because the estimated dietary<br />

exposures to these preservatives had the potential to exceed the ADI both in<br />

the whole population and in specific population subsets. Consequently, it was<br />

recommended that the concentration <strong>of</strong> sulfites in <strong>food</strong> and the dietary exposure to<br />

sulfites should be monitored. Therefore, sulfites were selected for assessment in<br />

the 21st Australian Total Diet Study (Food Standards Australia New Zealand, 2005),<br />

and Australia requested the Codex Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants<br />

(CCFAC, later split into CCFA and the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Food<br />

[CCCF]) at its Thirty-eighth Session (Codex Alimentarius Commission, 2006) to put<br />

a dietary exposure assessment <strong>of</strong> sulfites on the priority list for <strong>evaluation</strong> by the<br />

Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). The Thirty-ninth<br />

Session <strong>of</strong> CCFA reconfirmed the inclusion <strong>of</strong> sulfites on the priority list as a high<br />

priority (Codex Alimentarius Commission, 2007a).<br />

As sulfites are known to cause adverse reactions in specific subsets <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population, there are specific provisions in the Codex General Standard for the<br />

Labelling <strong>of</strong> Prepackaged Foods (Codex Alimentarius Commission, 1991) and in<br />

national legislation in a number <strong>of</strong> countries for the labelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>food</strong>s and beverages<br />

containing sulfites (e.g. in Directive 2003/89/EC; European Commission, 2003).<br />

This issue and that <strong>of</strong> the potential acute toxicity <strong>of</strong> sulfites in general were not dealt<br />

with by the Committee at its present meeting, which focused on long-term dietary<br />

exposure, in line with the CCFA request.<br />

2. CHEMISTRY AND ANALYTICAL METHODS<br />

2.1 Chemistry<br />

The <strong>additives</strong> listed under sulfites in the current Codex GSFA are sulfur<br />

dioxide (International Numbering System [INS] 220), sodium sulfite (INS 221),<br />

sodium hydrogen sulfite (INS 222), sodium metabisulfite (INS 223), potassium<br />

metabisulfite (INS 224), potassium sulfite (INS 225), calcium hydrogen sulfite<br />

1 Throughout the present report, the term maximum level (ML) is used to represent any<br />

maximum level set for a regulatory purpose at a national or international level.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!