12.07.2013 Views

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STEVIOL GLYCOSIDES (addendum) 193<br />

2.2.3 Long-term studies <strong>of</strong> toxicity and carcinogenicity<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> a study with stevia material <strong>of</strong> unspecified purity was to investigate<br />

potential inhibitory effects on tumour promotion in mice (Yasukawa et al., 2002).<br />

This was not informative for the current <strong>evaluation</strong>.<br />

In a study to investigate chemoprevention, the effect <strong>of</strong> rebaudioside A<br />

(purity >99.5%) on azoxymethane (AOM)–induced aberrant crypt foci (ACF) was<br />

studied in groups <strong>of</strong> male F344 rats. One group <strong>of</strong> 16 rats was given three weekly<br />

subcutaneous injections <strong>of</strong> AOM for 2 weeks and a diet containing 200 mg<br />

rebaudioside A/kg for 5 weeks, from 1 week before to 2 weeks after AOM administration,<br />

and was then sacrificed. The dose expressed as steviol was 6.6 μg/kg bw<br />

per day. Other groups received a diet containing rebaudioside A with no AOM<br />

injections (6 rats), a basal diet with no AOM (6 rats) or AOM injections and a basal<br />

diet only (16 rats). At the end <strong>of</strong> the study, the colons were removed from eight<br />

animals in the test group and from one in each <strong>of</strong> the control groups and examined<br />

for ACF. The colonic mucosa <strong>of</strong> the remaining animals from each group were pooled<br />

and examined for ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity. Silver-stained nucleolar<br />

organizer region (AgNOR) protein count was also determined for each group. Both<br />

ODC and AgNOR number are biomarkers for cell proliferation. The average body<br />

weights and mean liver weights <strong>of</strong> the animals receiving the test compound and the<br />

AOM injections were significantly lower than those <strong>of</strong> the animals receiving AOM<br />

alone. No signs <strong>of</strong> toxicity were observed, and <strong>food</strong> consumption was unaffected<br />

by treatment. There was a non-significant trend for rebaudioside A to reduce the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> AOM-induced ACF, mucosal ODC activity and the number <strong>of</strong> AgNORs<br />

(Kawamori et al., 1995).<br />

One other study was available on steviol-related material <strong>of</strong> unspecified<br />

composition, for which the administered dose <strong>of</strong> steviol could not be identified<br />

(Yamada et al., 1985).<br />

2.2.4 Genotoxicity<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> genotoxicity studies not previously reviewed were available,<br />

including four reverse mutation assays, all giving negative results up to concentrations<br />

<strong>of</strong> 10–50 mg/plate. One sister chromatid exchange assay, one chromosome<br />

aberration assay and one rec assay were also available, all giving negative results.<br />

Two micronucleus assays using human cells (lymphocytes and buccal mucosal<br />

cells) gave positive results (Hohn & Zankl, 1990). A forward mutation assay with<br />

Salmonella typhimurium strain TM677 gave positive results. In a review by Brusick<br />

(2008), the author concluded that the strain TM677 is uniquely sensitive to steviol<br />

when it is incubated in the presence <strong>of</strong> S9 from rats induced by polychlorinated<br />

biphenyls only, and therefore this is not likely to be relevant for the situation in vivo.<br />

A comet assay by Nunes et al. (2007) reviewed by the Committee at its sixtyeighth<br />

meeting, using rat liver, brain, blood and spleen cells, gave positive results.<br />

The validity <strong>of</strong> this assay has been questioned by other authors (Geuns, 2007;<br />

Williams, 2007), and the Committee previously concluded that it did not provide<br />

convincing evidence <strong>of</strong> genotoxicity.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the genotoxicity assays for stevioside and rebaudioside A are<br />

summarized in Table 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!