12.07.2013 Views

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SULFITES: ASSESSMENT OF DIETARY EXPOSURE 227<br />

In the current GSFA, most provisions for solid <strong>food</strong>s are in the range <strong>of</strong><br />

15–500 mg/kg. Most provisions for liquid <strong>food</strong>s are in the range <strong>of</strong> 50–200 mg/kg.<br />

Examples <strong>of</strong> solid <strong>food</strong>s for which there are provisions in the current Codex<br />

GSFA are processed vegetables (up to 500 mg/kg), processed fish and sea<strong>food</strong> (up<br />

to 150 mg/kg) and processed fruit (up to 1000 mg/kg in dried fruit). Examples <strong>of</strong><br />

liquid <strong>food</strong>s for which there are provisions are alcoholic drinks, including beer (up<br />

to 50 mg/l) and wine (up to 350 mg/l), fruit and vegetable juices (up to 50 mg/l) and<br />

water-based flavoured drinks (up to 70 mg/l).<br />

CCFA adopted MLs that are lower than the draft MLs that were used for the<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> dietary exposure to sulfites performed by the Committee at its fiftyfirst<br />

meeting. For example, for the category 04.1.2.2 “dried fruit”, the draft ML was<br />

5000 mg/kg and the ML in the current Codex GSFA is 1000 mg/kg.<br />

In most national legislation that regulates the use <strong>of</strong> sulfites, there are<br />

provisions for the same solid and liquid <strong>food</strong>s as in the current GSFA. The MLs set<br />

in some national regulations are higher than the MLs in the current GSFA for a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> categories <strong>of</strong> <strong>food</strong>s and beverages. This is the case for dried fruit (2000<br />

mg/kg in the EU and Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea and 3000 mg/kg in Australia and New<br />

Zealand versus 1000 mg/kg in the current GSFA), dried vegetables (3000 mg/kg in<br />

Australia and New Zealand versus 500 mg/kg in the current GSFA) and lemon juice<br />

(350 mg/l in the EU versus 50 mg/l in the current GSFA).<br />

The Committee noted that there are no provisions for the use <strong>of</strong> sulfites for<br />

any meat product either in the current GSFA or in Codex commodity standards. On<br />

the other hand, there are provisions for processed meats in some national legislation<br />

made available to the Committee. Sulfites are known to destroy thiamine. For this<br />

reason, the use <strong>of</strong> sulfites in <strong>food</strong>s that are considered an important source <strong>of</strong><br />

thiamine, such as meat products, is not permitted in some countries (e.g. Brazil) or<br />

is permitted only for limited applications (e.g. in the EU, sulfites can be used only in<br />

breakfast sausages and burger meats with vegetables and/or cereals, at a ML <strong>of</strong><br />

450 mg/kg, but cannot be used in burger meat in general). In Australia and New<br />

Zealand, sulfites can be used at up to 500 mg/kg in broader categories: in burger<br />

meat in general and in all sausages containing raw meat.<br />

3.2 Data made available to the Committee<br />

Data were made available to the Committee for the present <strong>evaluation</strong><br />

through submissions by Australia, Brazil, Germany and the United States <strong>of</strong><br />

America (USA). The Comité Européen des Fabricants de Sucre sent general<br />

comments on the sugar-related provisions in the current GSFA, but without any<br />

specific information in relation to dietary exposure. The data presented in these<br />

submissions were complemented with data from the literature referring to France,<br />

Italy, Lebanon and the United Kingdom. Only data published since the last<br />

<strong>evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> sulfites by the Committee in 2000 were considered in the present<br />

<strong>evaluation</strong>. Therefore, the data presented in the submission by the USA, which<br />

predated 2000, were not considered.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!