12.07.2013 Views

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

184 STEVIOL GLYCOSIDES (addendum)<br />

At its fifty-first meeting, the Committee evaluated toxicological data on<br />

stevioside and the aglycone steviol (Annex 1, reference 137) and specified further<br />

information needed. Based on new data and information, at its sixty-third meeting<br />

(Annex 1, reference 173), the Committee determined that the commercial material<br />

should be known as “steviol glycosides” and established tentative specifications for<br />

material containing not less than 95% <strong>of</strong> the total <strong>of</strong> four specified glycosylated derivatives<br />

<strong>of</strong> steviol (i.e. stevioside, rebaudioside A, rebaudioside C and dulcoside A).<br />

Additionally, the sum <strong>of</strong> stevioside and rebaudioside A content was specified at not<br />

less than 70% <strong>of</strong> the four steviol glycosides.<br />

Also at its sixty-third meeting, the Committee reviewed additional biochemical<br />

and toxicological data on the major steviol glycosides and on the aglycone<br />

steviol. The Committee noted that steviol glycosides are poorly absorbed and are<br />

metabolized by the intestinal micr<strong>of</strong>lora by successive hydrolytic removal <strong>of</strong> glucose<br />

units to the aglycone, steviol, which is well absorbed. Therefore, the toxicity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the glycosides was related to the steviol content. A temporary acceptable daily<br />

intake (ADI) <strong>of</strong> 0–2 mg/kg body weight (bw) for steviol glycosides expressed as<br />

steviol was established on the basis <strong>of</strong> the no-observed-effect level (NOEL) 1 <strong>of</strong> 2.5%<br />

stevioside in the diet, equal to 970 mg/kg bw per day, or 383 mg/kg bw per day<br />

expressed as steviol, in a 2-year study in rats and with a safety factor <strong>of</strong> 200. In the<br />

groups at 5%, final survival rates in the males and body weight gain and absolute<br />

kidney weights in both sexes showed significant reductions compared with those<br />

in controls. The overall safety factor <strong>of</strong> 200 incorporated a factor <strong>of</strong> 2 related to<br />

the need for further information, to be provided by 2007, on the pharmacological<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> steviol glycosides in humans. The Committee specified the need for<br />

studies involving repeated exposure <strong>of</strong> normotensive and hypotensive individuals<br />

and patients with type 1 (insulin-dependent) and type 2 (non-insulin-dependent)<br />

diabetes to dietary and therapeutic doses. This was because the evidence available<br />

at the time was inadequate to assess whether the pharmacological effects <strong>of</strong> steviol<br />

glycosides would also occur at dietary exposure levels, which could lead to adverse<br />

effects in some individuals (e.g. those with hypotension or diabetes).<br />

Also at its sixty-third meeting, the Committee estimated international intakes<br />

<strong>of</strong> steviol glycosides to be in the range <strong>of</strong> 1.3 (African diet) to 3.5 mg/kg bw per day<br />

(European diet), expressed as steviol, assuming that all dietary sugars (total sugars<br />

and honey) are replaced by steviol glycosides. The Committee acknowledged that<br />

this was a conservative estimate and that actual intakes were likely to be 20–30%<br />

<strong>of</strong> this figure.<br />

At its sixty-eighth meeting (Annex 1, reference 184), the Committee considered<br />

the information that had become available since the sixty-third meeting. This<br />

comprised two submissions, which included a summary <strong>of</strong> published toxicological<br />

studies and some unpublished data, additional information identified from the<br />

scientific literature and responses intended to resolve the outstanding issues<br />

1 Before the sixty-eighth meeting, the Committee used the term NOEL to include the current<br />

definitions <strong>of</strong> both NOEL and no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL). According to the<br />

decision taken by the Committee at its sixty-eighth meeting (Annex 1, reference 187), this<br />

NOEL would now be termed a NOAEL.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!