12.07.2013 Views

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52 ETHYL LAUROYL ARGINATE<br />

During the treatment period, clinical signs, body weight, and <strong>food</strong> and water<br />

consumption were recorded, and <strong>food</strong> conversion ratios were calculated. During<br />

week 13, blood samples were taken from the orbital sinus, and an extensive range<br />

<strong>of</strong> haematological and blood chemistry tests were performed. Also during week 13,<br />

the eyes <strong>of</strong> all the animals in the control and high-dose groups were examined, and<br />

urine was also collected for urinalysis and microscopy. Animals were subjected to<br />

a detailed necropsy, including organ weight analysis and histopathology.<br />

There were no treatment-related clinical signs observed during the study.<br />

There was one unscheduled death in a control male during week 1. No clinical signs<br />

had been noted for this animal, and the cause <strong>of</strong> death was determined to be a<br />

ruptured liver. The mean body weight gains for the female rats were significantly<br />

reduced (88%, 79% and 86% <strong>of</strong> control values for the three doses, respectively).<br />

There was no effect on male body weight, and so the effect on females was<br />

considered by the authors to be <strong>of</strong> un<strong>certain</strong> relationship to treatment. Mean<br />

cumulative <strong>food</strong> consumption was unaffected by treatment in any <strong>of</strong> the treatment<br />

groups. Females had slightly lower <strong>food</strong> utilization efficiencies, with no dose–<br />

response relationship. Group mean water intakes were generally comparable with<br />

those <strong>of</strong> controls, apart from males receiving 50 000 mg/kg diet, which had a slightly<br />

higher water consumption (117% <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong> the controls). There were no ocular<br />

lesions considered to be attributable to treatment. There was a slightly lower total<br />

white blood cell count among males and females receiving 12 800 and 50 000 mg/<br />

kg diet compared with controls, although there was no consistency in the type <strong>of</strong><br />

white blood cell affected, and significance was attained only for females (76% and<br />

72% <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong> the controls for the 12 800 and 50 000 mg/kg diet groups,<br />

respectively). There were no treatment-related biochemical changes. Males<br />

receiving 50 000 mg/kg diet had a slightly higher urine volume compared with<br />

controls, consistent with the increase in water intake. Females receiving 50 000 mg/<br />

kg diet had a slightly higher group mean relative liver weight compared with controls,<br />

although no microscopic changes were observed. At necropsy, an increased<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> alopecia was noted among females receiving 12 800 and 50 000 mg/<br />

kg diet, although this was considered <strong>of</strong> un<strong>certain</strong> biological significance. Minor nonsignificant<br />

changes (dilation, local inflammation, nodules) were observed<br />

macroscopically in the forestomach lining <strong>of</strong> animals receiving 12 800 and 50 000<br />

mg/kg diet. No other treatment-related changes were observed macroscopically or<br />

microscopically. The authors concluded that the no-effect level for the formulation<br />

was likely to be 12 800 mg/kg diet (equal to 175 mg ethyl-N -lauroyl-L-arginate HCl/<br />

kg bw per day) (Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd, 1996).<br />

A review <strong>of</strong> this study by a consultant haematologist (commissioned by<br />

Laboratorios Miret S.A. for Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd, where the study was<br />

performed) suggested that although a slight reduction in white blood cell count<br />

occurred with only minor visible damage to the stomach lining, such an effect is not<br />

uncommon in toxicological studies. The results suggested pre-ulcerative or preirritation<br />

changes that, owing to the nature <strong>of</strong> the formulation, had not progressed<br />

to positive damage, although they had been detected by the white blood cells owing<br />

to their sensitivity. The reduction <strong>of</strong> mature white blood cells in the peripheral blood<br />

was reported to be the result <strong>of</strong> a normal response to the changes induced in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!