12.07.2013 Views

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

Safety evaluation of certain food additives - ipcs inchem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STEVIOL GLYCOSIDES (addendum) 203<br />

glucose tolerance and 96.1 ± 2.2 kg for subjects with diabetes. The study was compliant<br />

with ICH ethics guidelines and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Participants<br />

received either rebaudioside A (97.4% rebaudioside A, remaining content other<br />

steviol glycosides) or placebo on two separate occasions, 1 week apart. Doses<br />

were randomly assigned, with individuals receiving 500 mg, 750 mg or 1000 mg<br />

rebaudioside A or placebo; all individuals received one dose <strong>of</strong> rebaudioside A<br />

and one placebo dose. Based on the mean body weight <strong>of</strong> the test subjects at<br />

the beginning <strong>of</strong> the study, the mean doses <strong>of</strong> rebaudioside A were 6.4, 9.5 and<br />

12.7 mg/kg bw (2.1, 3.1 and 4.2 mg/kg bw expressed as steviol) for subjects with<br />

normal glucose tolerance and 5.2, 7.8 and 10.4 mg/kg bw (1.7, 2.6 and 3.4 mg/kg<br />

bw expressed as steviol) for those with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Blood pressure,<br />

diet, physical activity, vital signs and adverse events were recorded at each clinic<br />

visit. Blood samples were taken 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210 and 240 min after<br />

the start <strong>of</strong> each dose period in all subjects and 270, 300, 330 and 360 min after the<br />

start <strong>of</strong> each dose period in those with normal glucose tolerance. Blood samples<br />

were analysed for glucose, insulin, C-peptide and glucagon. No statistically<br />

significant differences were found with any parameter at any dose in the test and<br />

control groups in either <strong>of</strong> the subgroups. The authors concluded that 1000 mg <strong>of</strong><br />

rebaudioside A (equivalent to 329 mg steviol) did not have adverse effects on blood<br />

pressure or glucose homeostasis in healthy individuals or individuals with type<br />

2 diabetes mellitus (Maki et al., 2007).<br />

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group trial was<br />

carried out in 100 healthy subjects with normal blood pressure (21 males and<br />

79 females aged 18–73 years). The study was compliant with ICH ethics guidelines.<br />

One group received 1000 mg rebaudioside A/day (97.4% purity, equivalent to<br />

4.6 mg/kg bw per day expressed as steviol, based on the mean body weight <strong>of</strong> the<br />

test subjects), and the other group received a placebo. All subjects consumed four<br />

capsules daily, two with breakfast and two with the evening meal, for 4 weeks. Vital<br />

signs and adverse events were recorded at each clinic visit, along with changes in<br />

the laboratory assessments. Blood pressure was recorded at screening and weekly<br />

during dosing, and assessments were taken when seated, supine and standing.<br />

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory measurements were also taken in weeks 0 and 4. Two<br />

individuals in the placebo group withdrew from the study during dosing, but their<br />

reasons were unrelated to the treatment. Sixteen subjects receiving the test<br />

compound experienced one or more adverse events, compared with 18 in the<br />

placebo group. Only one event in the placebo group was classified as a serious<br />

adverse event, and one event in each group was considered to be severe in<br />

intensity. These events included back pain, headache, rhinitis and upper respiratory<br />

tract infection. All events in the test compound group were considered to be<br />

unrelated or unlikely to be related to the treatment, and one event in the placebo<br />

group (pruritis) was considered to be possibly related to the placebo used. There<br />

was no evidence <strong>of</strong> any adverse effects <strong>of</strong> treatment from the haematology,<br />

biochemistry or urinalysis. At week 0, there were no significant differences between<br />

groups in the changes from pre-meal to post-meal values in seated, supine or<br />

standing blood pressures (systolic, diastolic or mean arterial pressure) or heart rate.<br />

At week 4, there were small post-meal increases in some <strong>of</strong> the blood pressure<br />

parameters in the rebaudioside A group, compared with small decreases in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!