19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

124 Alta Fölscher<br />

budgeting are located on a spectrum between incrementalism <strong>and</strong> pure<br />

comprehensive rationality. These approaches involve attention to the<br />

following key issues:<br />

Developing budgeting institutions that respond to incentives so that<br />

more of the traditional review, assessment, <strong>and</strong> allocation work of central<br />

budget offices is done at the spending ministry level, where there is<br />

better information, because it is in the spending ministry’s own interest<br />

to have it done well<br />

Improving but demarcating <strong>and</strong> sequencing the information that is<br />

brought to bear on budgeting decisions<br />

Making budget decision-making processes more transparent, including<br />

the ex ante setting of rational allocation criteria<br />

Introducing a focus on outputs <strong>and</strong> ultimately on results as the driver of<br />

discussions in the budget process.<br />

To a large degree, modern budgeting techniques do not operate on their<br />

own. Where they are successful, they are linked to an overall approach to<br />

managing the public sector, with the budget <strong>and</strong> its associated methods as a<br />

central process to make the approach operational.<br />

Modern budgeting practices now include New <strong>Public</strong> Management<br />

(NPM) approaches. NPM approaches involve the targeting of organizational<br />

incentives to leverage changes in how individual agencies budget <strong>and</strong><br />

spend. Most notably, they involve the decentralization of responsibilities to<br />

lower organizational levels, including the discretion to decide how funds<br />

will be spent <strong>and</strong> to account for what was achieved with funds received. By<br />

bringing the responsibility to budget closer to better information about<br />

spending efficiency <strong>and</strong> effectiveness <strong>and</strong> by holding managers accountable<br />

for results, NPM approaches try to use the alignment of incentives to<br />

improve the quality of spending decisions. An NPM approach to budgeting,<br />

therefore, works only if it also includes reorganizing the budget into an<br />

output- or product-based format or narrowly linking a traditional inputbased<br />

format to measurable targets.<br />

Larbi (1999) identifies circumstances in both developing <strong>and</strong> industrial<br />

countries that lead to the proliferation of NPM-type reforms in budgeting<br />

practices (table 4.1).<br />

NPM is a set of broadly similar structural, organizational, <strong>and</strong> managerial<br />

changes in public sectors. It shifts the emphasis from traditional public<br />

administration to public management. Table 4.2 sets out typical characteristics<br />

of an NPM approach <strong>and</strong> notes how the principles have been applied<br />

in the budgeting environment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!