19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

228 Gary Cokins<br />

Without visible, relevant, <strong>and</strong> valid data, it is difficult for organizations to<br />

stimulate ideas <strong>and</strong> evaluate what options are available—<strong>and</strong> what their financial<br />

effect will be.ABC/M data provide fundamental information that is part of<br />

the solution.Applying ABC/M may well be critical to an organization’s survival.<br />

Government is moving past the initial stage of rethinking what government<br />

does <strong>and</strong> how it does it. Restrictive funding pressures have already<br />

jump-started that activity. Now government units are adopting a greater<br />

performance orientation <strong>and</strong> are replacing a detailed micromanagement<br />

style with a more practical approach, one in which the costs are justified by<br />

the benefits. ABC/M is now playing <strong>and</strong> will continue to play an important<br />

role in helping the government to manage its affairs.<br />

As important as it is, however, ABC/M is not a panacea. As mentioned<br />

earlier, cost management should always be done in the broader context of<br />

performance management, integrating time, quality, service levels, capacity<br />

planning, <strong>and</strong> costs. But an organization’s underst<strong>and</strong>ing of its cost-structure<br />

behavior is critical, so a managerial accounting system that supports managerial<br />

economic analysis, which ABC/M does, is critical for all stakeholders—<br />

employees, the community, loyal customers, <strong>and</strong> shareholders.<br />

Annex 7A: Case Study<br />

ABC/M in a State Road Maintenance Department<br />

The “end of the road”final-final cost objects consume all the cost assignments<br />

that have occurred to that point. Some cost assignments are direct to the<br />

final-final objects, but in increasingly overhead-intensive organizations, most<br />

costs arrive as indirect <strong>and</strong> shared costs.<br />

As an example, a government road maintenance <strong>and</strong> repair department<br />

does not directly service individual types of cars or trucks or individual types<br />

of drivers. The inherent diversity originates in the type of road. The characteristics<br />

of the road cause the work crews to do more or less work. The weight<br />

of trucks may cause more road damage than the weight of automobiles, but<br />

the type of vehicle is more of a higher-order cost driver than an activity driver.<br />

The causal force of trucks versus automobiles may certainly be discussed when<br />

seeking ways to improve costs. However, for the purposes of ABC/M, the<br />

roadbed itself serves as the best source (that is, the final-final cost object) for<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing the interdependencies of costs. The roadbed is the only<br />

practical way of connecting an output of the department’s workload back to<br />

the used resources (types of trucks, garages, employees, <strong>and</strong> so on). Figure<br />

7A.1 provides a simplified diagram of the ABC/M cost-assignment network

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!