19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

What Would an Ideal <strong>Public</strong> Finance Management System Look Like? 381<br />

established such processes across their entire PFM systems. This could<br />

be one of the main reasons that the results of strategic budgeting, with its<br />

performance orientation, are still muted in even the best cases.<br />

Moving Ahead: Toward a Full Response for the G8<br />

In working with countries that are trying to improve their PFM systems,<br />

many colleagues have been amazed at the number of officials who have asked<br />

if there is any one best way. Unfortunately, there is not: no silver bullet or<br />

magic potion. This fact makes the G8 call for a PFM “code” quite interesting.<br />

It seems to be a call for the identification of a one-best-way or a how-itshould-be-done<br />

model for PFM.<br />

This chapter interprets the call a little differently. It sees the call coming<br />

at a time when there are many different approaches to PFM, lots of money<br />

being spent on PFM reform, <strong>and</strong> many governments facing PFM results that<br />

suggests suboptimality. Against that backdrop, the G8 finance ministers are<br />

asking for some clarity, some st<strong>and</strong>ardization, <strong>and</strong> some guidance as to how<br />

to look at PFM systems in a structured manner.<br />

This chapter attempts to provide some ideas in this light. It introduces<br />

the PEFA framework as a potential foundation for a PFM code <strong>and</strong> then<br />

discusses the need to go beyond PEFA:<br />

To ensure full, integrated coverage of all PFM processes <strong>and</strong> of connections<br />

between such processes<br />

To ensure that all role players are given attention in the framework, especially<br />

spending agencies <strong>and</strong> civil society entities<br />

To ensure that the goal contingency of PFM processes is clearly presented,<br />

even to the point where different indicator sets are used to reflect the<br />

“appropriate”look for PFM systems at different levels of goal achievement.<br />

The PEFA indicators have been useful to many governments <strong>and</strong> to<br />

many in the donor community by providing a guide for PFM reform <strong>and</strong> a<br />

mechanism for evaluating PFM system quality. Moving beyond PEFA in the<br />

ways discussed in this article could facilitate the development of an even<br />

more useful product in the future—a more complete code to meet the<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> of the G8.<br />

Notes<br />

1. The framework draws on the Heavily Indebted Poor Country expenditure tracking<br />

benchmarks, the International Monetary Fund’s Fiscal Transparency Code, <strong>and</strong><br />

other international st<strong>and</strong>ards.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!