19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Country Case Study: Kenya 483<br />

were also not interested in participating in the SWGs: they perceived the<br />

process to be of little value. Second, early resource allocation also meant that<br />

the MTEF did not operate as a rolling budget: issuing new ceilings at the start<br />

of the budget preparation process created the impression that each budget<br />

cycle started afresh, disconnected from what went previously.<br />

For the 2007/08 budget, however, the budget framework presented in the<br />

BOPA will use the final sector ceilings of the previous year for years 1 <strong>and</strong> 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> will add a third year. The framework will show the total pool of projected<br />

“new” money separately as unallocated funds. This new system will provide<br />

an incentive for spending agencies to improve the quality of their forward<br />

estimates (which will form the base of future budgets) <strong>and</strong> for new spending<br />

to maximize ministry shares in the indicated additional resources.<br />

The Kenyan emphasis on the role of sectors in the budget process has<br />

brought significant benefits. Reports on the 2004/05 budget process—when the<br />

BOPA was first launched <strong>and</strong> sectors worked internally on intrasectoral allocations<br />

before the BSP—show that in some SWGs a real process of negotiation<br />

occurred. Ministries were prepared to concede that fellow sector ministries’<br />

priorities might be more pressing than their own, given the interests of the<br />

sector as a whole. They were prepared to relinquish funding in the short term—<br />

in favor of a priority ministry—in exchange for additional funding down the<br />

line. In effect, the cooperative nature of the SWG process forced individual<br />

spending ministries to better underst<strong>and</strong> the opportunity cost of their own<br />

spending proposals, to provide better information on their own spending, <strong>and</strong><br />

to be prepared to look for greater efficiencies in their own spending.<br />

The SWGs’ work culminates in the production of an SWG report. These<br />

reports document SWG analysis <strong>and</strong> decisions in accordance with the SWG<br />

functions listed previously. The report is a key document for ministries: it is<br />

the primary instrument through which their proposals for additional funding<br />

will be heard at the central level. The draft SWG reports are published before<br />

the sector hearings.<br />

sector hearings. The sector hearings take place in February <strong>and</strong><br />

March <strong>and</strong> provide an opportunity for government to consult with stakeholders<br />

on its spending proposals. The hearings are open to any member of<br />

the public. They are attended mostly by sector NGOs, research organizations,<br />

<strong>and</strong> sector donors.<br />

the budget strategy paper. The BSP is the second <strong>and</strong><br />

final prebudget statement <strong>and</strong> marks the end of the MTEF phase of the<br />

MTEF-budget process. The paper updates the BOPA in terms of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!