19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Budgeting</strong> in Postconflict Countries 445<br />

<strong>and</strong> a determination of the pledges from different donors <strong>and</strong> the probable<br />

timing of their contributions can some sense of available resources be obtained.<br />

The needs identified in the JAM are then articulated into more concrete<br />

projects <strong>and</strong> programs, <strong>and</strong> a rudimentary budget eventually emerges, hopefully<br />

consistent with the financial resources available. (The bulk of the financing<br />

is likely to come from donors, because in the immediate postconflict period,<br />

domestic resources <strong>and</strong> taxation capabilities are extremely limited.)<br />

Thus, in postconflict countries, the forecast of (mostly foreign) revenue<br />

is only an initial point of reference for the construction of a budget, for<br />

which additional aid may well become available if the expenditure proposals<br />

are well justified <strong>and</strong> the system is ready to implement them. However,<br />

even if only as initial reference, a revenue forecast should still be used to<br />

frame budget preparation so that the country can gradually move toward a<br />

realistic, resource-constrained budgeting system when the immediate<br />

postconflict urgencies have been surmounted, <strong>and</strong> also so that it can begin<br />

creating good budgeting habits grounded on realism rather than wishful<br />

thinking. The other major requirement is to screen carefully the various<br />

expenditure proposals—whether included in the JAM or generated separately—with<br />

the help of the guidelines <strong>and</strong> tests suggested below.<br />

Screening <strong>Sector</strong> Expenditure Program Proposals<br />

Next to expenditure control, the second objective of public expenditure<br />

management—allocative efficiency—calls for distributing financial resources<br />

across different sectors to maximize the aggregate efficiency of resources.<br />

This criterion is good in theory but a practical chimera, especially in postconflict<br />

situations. One cannot decide on a technical basis whether refurbishing<br />

a destroyed primary school in district A is more efficient than rebuilding<br />

a rural road in district B. This conundrum does not imply, however, that<br />

sector allocation decisions necessarily have to be made only on political <strong>and</strong><br />

discretionary grounds, <strong>and</strong> certain guidelines can be formulated. In practice,<br />

as stressed repeatedly, in postconflict countries all budgeting criteria must<br />

be applied with a great deal of flexibility, simplicity, pragmatism, <strong>and</strong> common<br />

sense. The following basic decision tests, however, are substantively the same,<br />

<strong>and</strong> their sequence is m<strong>and</strong>atory—that is, one does not query program costing<br />

before having determined that the program is more or less consistent<br />

with the policy for the sector. In a postconflict setting, of course, these criteria<br />

must be applied very flexibly.<br />

1. Is the overall sector expenditure request within the sectoral expenditure<br />

ceiling? If No, return for downward adjustment without comment; if Yes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!