19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

314 Daniel Tommasi<br />

If compliance is weak <strong>and</strong> commercial banks are subject to political pressure,<br />

the TSA model that centralizes only the cash balances (case 2) could present<br />

higher fiduciary risks than the TSA model that centralizes all payment transactions<br />

(case 1).<br />

In the case of the TSA model that centralizes all payment transactions,<br />

different control systems can be considered, as noted earlier. At first glance,<br />

the variant that places controls on the processing <strong>and</strong> accounting of payment<br />

transactions under the full responsibility of the treasury department might<br />

seem more efficient from the viewpoint of both cash management <strong>and</strong><br />

expenditure control. However, the experience of some francophone systems<br />

indicates that the centralization of accounting controls <strong>and</strong> the central<br />

management of floats can lead to inefficiencies—<strong>and</strong> even corruption—in<br />

countries with poor governance, particularly where the treasury is responsible<br />

for selecting the suppliers to be paid. Such a system should evolve<br />

toward making line ministries more responsible <strong>and</strong> accountable. Implementing<br />

a financial ledger system, in which all transactions are recorded,<br />

is generally seen as a good method for balancing properly the needs for<br />

control <strong>and</strong> the needs for giving line ministries full responsibility.<br />

For remote agencies, the organization of the payment system must take<br />

into account the system of public administration <strong>and</strong> banking infrastructure<br />

in the country concerned. Using an imprest system can be considered<br />

for these agencies. Because most countries use the greater portion of their<br />

cash either for transactions at the central level (for example, debt payments<br />

<strong>and</strong> expenditures managed by the central departments of line ministries) or<br />

for payments that are due on a fixed date (for example, wage payments),<br />

such arrangements would allow most cash balances to be centralized. In<br />

many countries, streamlining cash management could consist of (a) daily<br />

centralization of transactions made at the central level, through a TSA, <strong>and</strong><br />

(b) for remote agencies, a procedure based on imprest advances.<br />

Whatever the institutional arrangements, the centralization of cash<br />

balances should cover all the government accounts used for payment transactions,<br />

including accounts managed by extrabudgetary funds.<br />

Tax collection<br />

The interval between the time when cash is received <strong>and</strong> the time it is available<br />

for carrying out expenditure programs should be minimized. Revenues<br />

need to be processed promptly <strong>and</strong> made available for use. By virtue of the<br />

banking sector infrastructure, commercial banks are often able to collect<br />

revenues more efficiently than tax offices can. Tax offices should therefore<br />

focus instead on tracking taxpayers, issuing tax assessments, monitoring

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!