19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

64 Salvatore Schiavo-Campo<br />

transactions, the optimal policy response is to improve the budgetary<br />

procedures, to set up specific procedures for those particular transactions,<br />

or to do both, rather than placing the transactions themselves outside the<br />

budget process. In practice, especially in developing countries, earmarking<br />

arrangements, separate funds, or autonomous management may be desirable<br />

to improve efficiency in public spending.<br />

Nevertheless, EBFs are a common feature of budgetary systems almost<br />

everywhere. In industrial countries, nonbudgetary functions account, on<br />

average, for about one-third of total government expenditures (mostly for<br />

pensions, which account for about 90 percent of nonbudgetary expenditures).<br />

In African developing countries, the importance of pension EBFs is<br />

much lower, but other extrabudgetary expenditures are much higher, <strong>and</strong><br />

EBFs account for between one-fifth <strong>and</strong> two-fifths of total spending (the<br />

variation between countries is much greater than in industrial countries). 2<br />

Thus, an alternative to avoiding EBFs is to distinguish between different<br />

types of EBFs <strong>and</strong> make provisions to manage them <strong>and</strong> reduce their attendant<br />

risks. This pragmatic <strong>and</strong> sensible approach is taken in a recent study<br />

by Richard Allen <strong>and</strong> Dimitar Radev (forthcoming).<br />

The bottom line is that budgetary management authority must not be<br />

allowed to lead to loss of expenditure control or erosion of financial<br />

integrity. Thus, the st<strong>and</strong>ards of scrutiny <strong>and</strong> accountability for expenditures<br />

financed from funds, autonomous agencies, or special accounts should be<br />

no lower than those applied to other expenditures. To verify that EBFs meet<br />

these st<strong>and</strong>ards, their gross financial transactions must be regularly included<br />

in the budget documentation even if no legislative approval is sought.<br />

Types of Special Arrangements<br />

EBFs come in many forms, the main types of which are discussed in turn<br />

below, beginning with the most frequent, social security funds.<br />

Social security funds<br />

Social security covers a variety of services classified into three broad categories:<br />

1. Social insurance, which is generally financed with contributions from<br />

employers <strong>and</strong> employees <strong>and</strong> yields benefits linked to the contributions<br />

2. Direct provision of a service or cash payment to a defined group of beneficiaries,<br />

such as family allowances, pensions, <strong>and</strong> maternity grants<br />

3. Social assistance—that is, payments or services contingent on investigation<br />

of the needs <strong>and</strong> financial status of the beneficiary (assistance to the<br />

elderly, h<strong>and</strong>icapped, jobless, <strong>and</strong> so on).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!