19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Burundi: An Encouraging Case<br />

<strong>Budgeting</strong> in Postconflict Countries 453<br />

Since its independence in 1962, Burundi has been in almost continuous conflict—repressed<br />

for some periods only to flare up periodically. Burundi’s<br />

population consists of a Hutu majority, a large Tutsi minority, <strong>and</strong> a smaller<br />

Twa group. Until recently, Burundi’s governments have been led by Tutsis.<br />

Coups <strong>and</strong> spasms of mass violence, with the victims mainly Hutus, have<br />

punctuated the history of the country. In 1963, <strong>and</strong> then again in 1972, 1988,<br />

<strong>and</strong> 1993, large-scale massacres preceded or followed military coups. The<br />

last such event, ensuing from the assassination in 1993 of Melchior Ndadaye,<br />

the first Hutu elected president of the country, led to widespread civil war<br />

for a decade. The total number of victims of internal conflict is always difficult<br />

to estimate with reasonable confidence, but over the entire period from<br />

1962 to 2003, credible estimates for Burundi are of at least 500,000 people<br />

killed, 1 million people internally displaced, <strong>and</strong> another million refugees in<br />

neighboring countries, mainly Rw<strong>and</strong>a <strong>and</strong> Tanzania—in a country with a<br />

total population of barely 7 million.<br />

Tragically, Burundi’s history could have been entirely different from the<br />

beginning, were it not for the 1961 assassination of Prince Louis Rwagasore,<br />

a Tutsi slated to become prime minister as leader of an ethnically mixed<br />

party that advocated tolerance <strong>and</strong> interethnic amity. Thus, viewing the conflict<br />

in Burundi as exclusively ethnic—between the minority Tutsis in power<br />

<strong>and</strong> the majority Hutus—is an oversimplification. First, the ruling elite was<br />

only a segment of the Tutsi population, <strong>and</strong> many Tutsis were excluded from<br />

power. Second, economic causes—primarily conflict over l<strong>and</strong>—were a<br />

major contributing factor. Nevertheless, however fostered, magnified, <strong>and</strong><br />

exploited for the benefit of the ruling elite, ethnic fear <strong>and</strong> hostility have<br />

indeed become the major causes of the conflict.<br />

The first step toward a resolution of the conflict was the Arusha Agreement<br />

of 2000, signed by the government <strong>and</strong> the main rebel groups, which set in<br />

motion a phased peace process. Although armed conflict continued, its intensity<br />

lessened, <strong>and</strong> the process gradually led to a new constitution, which was<br />

approved overwhelmingly by referendum in February 2005. This success was<br />

followed by rounds of free elections, culminating in the election of a new president,<br />

Pierre Nkurunziza (the leader of the former main Hutu rebel group), <strong>and</strong><br />

the installation of a new government in August 2005. In mid-2006, the last<br />

holdout rebel group signed the peace agreement, <strong>and</strong> the political <strong>and</strong> security<br />

situation appeared stable—buttressed by the keen desire on the part of most<br />

Burundians to put their country’s violent history behind them.<br />

Owing to the years of conflict, the new government has inherited an<br />

economy characterized by endemic poverty, overwhelming debt, widespread

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!