19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

404 Salvatore Schiavo-Campo<br />

programming of the largest single category of expenditure. In industrial<br />

economies, the largest public expenditures are in pensions <strong>and</strong> health insurance.<br />

In almost all African countries, the largest category of government<br />

expenditure is public investment.<br />

Investment programming<br />

Investment is a source of growth <strong>and</strong> at the same time of future debt service<br />

<strong>and</strong> recurrent expenditure commitments—<strong>and</strong> thus potential fiscal risk.<br />

The quality <strong>and</strong> efficiency of investment determine whether its growth<br />

impact is greater than the fiscal costs. In turn, investment quality <strong>and</strong> efficiency<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> realistic programming. Without good programming of investments,<br />

including sound preparation of investment projects, neither the<br />

growth potential nor fiscal discipline can materialize. In the 1980s <strong>and</strong> early<br />

1990s, PIPs in most African developing countries were “first-generation<br />

PIPs,” largely consisting of wish lists <strong>and</strong> project-pushing devices to attract<br />

foreign aid. By contrast, in a “second-generation PIP,” the strategic decisions<br />

<strong>and</strong> the good project choices come first, <strong>and</strong> only then is the right financing<br />

sought. This inversion of priorities puts the recipient government back in<br />

the driver’s seat <strong>and</strong> ensures that the growth <strong>and</strong> social effect of public<br />

investment will far outweigh the resulting debt service <strong>and</strong> justify the future<br />

recurrent costs. Thus, a second-generation PIP (a) raises investment efficiency<br />

by improving project quality; (b) brings investment allocation in line with<br />

country policies <strong>and</strong> sectoral priorities; (c) ensures consistency between<br />

investment programs <strong>and</strong> available financing at favorable terms; <strong>and</strong>, as<br />

noted, (d) leads, in time, to a more comprehensive MTEF.<br />

The following are PIP priorities:<br />

First, design ironclad procedures against the birth of “white elephant”<br />

projects. Once a project of large size is on the drawing board, the bureaucratic<br />

dynamics from both donor <strong>and</strong> recipient sides make the project<br />

very difficult to stop.Among these procedures, the involvement of high-level<br />

policy makers (<strong>and</strong>, for very large projects, the cabinet) must be built in<br />

at a very early stage.<br />

Also basic is the need for reasonably sound economic appraisal of projects.<br />

Because of the need to economize on scarce capacity (<strong>and</strong> to minimize<br />

reliance on expatriate expertise), in developing countries simple appraisal<br />

methods are preferable to sophisticated ones. Also, selectivity is needed:<br />

only projects of significant size should be analyzed in detail, with smaller<br />

projects bundled <strong>and</strong> the bundles evaluated only for their general correspondence<br />

with sectoral policies <strong>and</strong> common sense.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!