19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Country Case Study: South Africa 521<br />

documents in the budget cycle, the review has become an annual feature in<br />

the cycle, thereby contributing to a high <strong>and</strong> continuing level of transparency<br />

in a very complex system.<br />

Finally, in addition to the spending information in the documents<br />

described above, actual spending information is published in-year on a<br />

monthly basis for all national departments <strong>and</strong> on a quarterly basis across<br />

national <strong>and</strong> provincial governments. Published by the National Treasury, this<br />

information provides vital information to Parliament <strong>and</strong> other stakeholders<br />

with which to monitor budget implementation. The information is submitted<br />

to the National Treasury under the statutory reporting requirements of spending<br />

departments <strong>and</strong> forms part of the early warning system whereby deviation<br />

from spending plans can be detected early <strong>and</strong> addressed by the treasuries.<br />

A New Framework for <strong>Public</strong> Financial Management<br />

<strong>and</strong> Reporting<br />

The introduction of an MTEF for fiscal year 1998/99 was followed by the introduction<br />

of a program of financial management improvement. A cornerstone<br />

of this program is the <strong>Public</strong> Financial Management Act of 1999 (PFMA),<br />

which came into effect in April 2000. The PFMA repealed the 10 exchequer<br />

acts that previously governed public financial management. It was developed<br />

to transform an environment in which financial administration was rule<br />

bound <strong>and</strong> management exclusively input focused, policy <strong>and</strong> financial<br />

responsibilities in departments were separated, capital resources <strong>and</strong> liabilities<br />

were not properly managed, <strong>and</strong> reliable <strong>and</strong> timely information was greatly<br />

lacking. The resources of the national <strong>and</strong> provincial treasuries were devoted<br />

excessively to exercising microcontrol (even mundane matters were referred<br />

to them for approval), while too little attention was paid to strategic management<br />

of public finances in line with policy <strong>and</strong> efficiency objectives. In short,<br />

practice of functional financial management of public resources in government<br />

as a whole was insufficient.<br />

The PFMA put in place a legal framework for modern public financial<br />

management, shifting the onus of managing the use of resources from central<br />

control to the managers of spending departments <strong>and</strong> agencies. This<br />

change mirrors the shift in budget preparation practices from central decision<br />

making to discretion resting with spending departments for program<br />

choices within spending ceilings.<br />

To engineer this shift, the PFMA does not prescribe specifics (for example,<br />

what payment approval procedures should be). Instead, the act specifies who<br />

is responsible for putting in place such procedures, what the procedures<br />

should achieve, what the information <strong>and</strong> reporting requirements are, how

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!