19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

132 Alta Fölscher<br />

ministries to link budgets <strong>and</strong> operational performance to their policies <strong>and</strong><br />

priorities. PERs are often reviewed in a public process, thereby further<br />

improving the quality of the information they contain. Typically, they<br />

provide financial <strong>and</strong> nonfinancial outturn data for the ministry, analyzing<br />

expenditure trends <strong>and</strong> relating financial performance to policy performance.<br />

An analysis of the effectiveness <strong>and</strong> efficiency of agencies’ spending<br />

forms the core of a good PER. PERs present an opportunity for joint<br />

systematic review of spending agencies’ performance <strong>and</strong> for consensus on<br />

the issues that frame agencies’ forward budgets. In essence, they improve the<br />

quality of information.<br />

activity-based costing <strong>and</strong> programming techniques.<br />

A functional MTEF requires that resource allocations be set on<br />

the basis of a comprehensive top-down expenditure framework <strong>and</strong> costed<br />

bottom-up expenditure options. The introduction of activity-based budgeting<br />

at the sector level has therefore formed part of the implementation of<br />

MTEFs in a number of countries, including Ghana, Malawi, <strong>and</strong> Zambia.<br />

Although the specifics of systems differ across countries, they follow a<br />

similar logical framework approach to planning <strong>and</strong> budgeting at the level<br />

of ministries.<br />

Spending agencies are first required to identify their objectives (or the<br />

changes they seek to effect in the real world) for the medium term <strong>and</strong> to set<br />

outputs (or deliverables) for each objective. Outputs are usually defined as the<br />

expected means for achieving the objectives, <strong>and</strong> ministries are required to set<br />

targets over the medium term. These targets are expected to be specific,<br />

measurable, achievable, realistic, <strong>and</strong> time bound. The next step is simply to<br />

identify what activities will deliver each output <strong>and</strong> its associated inputs. Inputs<br />

are required to be broken down into quantities <strong>and</strong> frequency. Common<br />

activities <strong>and</strong> inputs have unit costs that are applied across the government.<br />

The product of the unit cost, the quantity, <strong>and</strong> the frequency of the input equals<br />

the total input cost. The sum of all total input costs equals the activity cost. The<br />

activity costs are added up to arrive at the output cost, the objective cost, <strong>and</strong><br />

eventually the spending agency’s budget. Objectives are commonly associated<br />

with longst<strong>and</strong>ing programs. Cost centers are also usually identified, so that the<br />

implementation of activities <strong>and</strong> the use of funds can be traced back to specific<br />

institutions <strong>and</strong> subinstitutional structures.<br />

Experience with activity-based budgets in developing countries is<br />

mixed. First, like other pure, comprehensive, rationality-based instruments,<br />

these budgets require a luxury of information, capacity, <strong>and</strong> time<br />

that are simply not available. Significant efforts went into the development

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!