19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Accrual Accounting in the <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Sector</strong> 181<br />

Differences between Cash <strong>and</strong> Accrual Accounting in the<br />

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Sector</strong><br />

What are the key differences between cash <strong>and</strong> accrual systems of accounting<br />

as applied to the public sector? 1 The cash system of accounting is one in which<br />

expenses <strong>and</strong> revenues are recorded in the period that payments are made or<br />

received. The accrual system of accounting is one in which revenues are<br />

recorded in the period in which they are earned (whether received or not)<br />

<strong>and</strong> expenses in the period in which they are incurred (whether paid or not).<br />

The cash system of accounting has traditionally been used in the public<br />

sector. It matches well with the annual budgeting <strong>and</strong> revenue collection<br />

systems used by governments <strong>and</strong> legislatures in industrial countries. More<br />

recently, led primarily by the international agencies, such as the OECD, the<br />

IMF, <strong>and</strong> the World Bank, <strong>and</strong> by some international accounting bodies, such<br />

as IFAC, countries have been strongly encouraged to adopt the accounting<br />

system generally used by the private sector: accrual accounting.<br />

The most profound difference between the two accounting systems<br />

relates to the time transactions are recorded. For example, under a cash<br />

accounting system, revenue is not recorded until it is actually received,<br />

whereas under an accrual system, revenue is recorded when it is earned, even<br />

if it is not received until far into the future. Likewise, under a cash system,<br />

expenses are not recorded until they are actually paid. In contrast, under the<br />

accrual system, expenses are recorded when they are incurred, even if they<br />

are not actually paid until far into the future.<br />

The difference between the two systems can be made clear by considering<br />

a couple of examples. Consider first the accounting treatment of the purchase<br />

of a capital asset. Suppose a government purchases an office building. Under a<br />

cash system of accounting, the full cost of the building is recorded as an expense<br />

in the year it is purchased. Under an accrual system, the depreciation of the<br />

building is recorded as an expense in each year of the useful life of the building.<br />

A second example relates to public sector pensions. Under a cash system,<br />

recorded pension expenses are measured by the payments made to beneficiaries<br />

during the relevant accounting period (usually a year). However, under<br />

an accrual system, recorded pension expenses are measured by the change in<br />

estimated pension liabilities. Thus, all other things equal, if the government<br />

changes a pension policy that will result in higher pension payments in the<br />

future, the estimated discounted sum of those additional payments is<br />

recorded as a pension expense in the period the policy change occurred.<br />

Of course, both accounting systems have strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses<br />

when applied to the public sector. Table 6.1 highlights the key strengths <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!