19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Strengthening <strong>Public</strong> Expenditure Management in Africa 403<br />

framework, linked with the annual budget preparation, <strong>and</strong> including only<br />

programs or projects for which financing is certain. The aim is to eventually<br />

prepare annually a formal rolling medium-term expenditure framework<br />

(MTEF) with the same coverage <strong>and</strong> in the same degree of detail as the annual<br />

budget. This framework should be composed of bottom-up programs—<br />

formulated by each ministry <strong>and</strong> consistent with government policy for the<br />

sector—focusing only on the estimated future cost of existing activities<br />

(ongoing policies), with expenditures for new policies decided only during the<br />

preparation of the annual budget. (To do otherwise would risk turning<br />

medium-term expenditure programming into medium-term expenditure<br />

entitlements.) This ambitious objective, which requires substantial capacity<br />

building in line ministries, should be approached gradually:<br />

At first, the overall multiyear programs would include bottom-up programs<br />

by only one or two major ministries <strong>and</strong> still rely on aggregate estimates<br />

for the remainder of expenditures.<br />

The bottom-up expenditure programs would gradually be exp<strong>and</strong>ed to<br />

more <strong>and</strong> more ministries.<br />

Eventually, some vertical deepening of the MTEF mechanism to subnational<br />

levels of government may be realistic <strong>and</strong> desirable. However, here<br />

again, the realities of opportunity cost <strong>and</strong> diminishing returns must be<br />

confronted. To push an ill-equipped <strong>and</strong> overstretched local government<br />

to formulate detailed MTEFs with full costing of specific activities linked<br />

to various outputs would raise transaction costs way beyond the benefits<br />

<strong>and</strong>—worse—would absorb very scarce local capacity needed to meet<br />

urgent poverty reduction <strong>and</strong> service priorities. The right cost-benefit<br />

balance must be struck, in terms relevant to the local context.<br />

Concurrently, aid-dependent African countries should move to preparing a<br />

strong public investment program (PIP) on a rolling basis <strong>and</strong> estimate the<br />

forward local costs of projects financed by external sources. (This process is<br />

discussed at greater length in the next section.)<br />

A country can gain experience toward an MTEF by preparing a full-sector<br />

expenditure program for one or two key sectors—provided that the<br />

program is framed by sound aggregate projections of expenditures, by<br />

function <strong>and</strong> broad economic category.<br />

The right question, therefore, is not the elementary one of whether a<br />

comprehensive MTEF is preferable to medium-term programming of<br />

investment alone—obviously, it is. The right question is how to arrive at a<br />

comprehensive MTEF. The clear first step is to have good medium-term

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!