19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Country Case Study: Kenya 475<br />

Budget Supply Department in the Ministry of Finance, which is responsible<br />

for compiling the annual budget estimates, the legal budget control instrument<br />

that is submitted to the legislature for approval. At the same time,<br />

the development budget is compiled. The annual recurrent estimates <strong>and</strong><br />

the development estimates are laid before the legislature in June each year,<br />

starting the legislative budget process.<br />

Instruments of the budget process<br />

the ministerial public expenditure reviews.<br />

MPERs have been a feature of the MTEF-budget process since the early years<br />

of the MTEF. The reviews are aimed at institutionalizing a review of the<br />

performance of existing expenditure against policy priorities within the<br />

budget preparation process. The reviews were first introduced under a joint<br />

Ministry of Finance <strong>and</strong> Planning. However, when the new government came<br />

to power in 2002, two separate ministries were created. The PERs—together<br />

with the MTEF Secretariat initially—were located in the Ministry of Planning<br />

<strong>and</strong> National Development. This institutional separation of the MPERs<br />

from the rest of the budget processes has underpinned ongoing overlap in<br />

functions <strong>and</strong> a disconnect in sequencing between the MPER <strong>and</strong> other<br />

budget process instruments, such as the SWG reports.<br />

The MPERs involve reviewing ministerial programs <strong>and</strong> activities in<br />

line with core functions of the ministry <strong>and</strong> identifying the bottlenecks in<br />

expenditure management. The MPERs do not merely look backward; they<br />

also have a forward-looking component. Ministries are required to cost their<br />

baseline <strong>and</strong> new programs <strong>and</strong> prioritize the programs in line with their<br />

core functions. An example of a typical MPER is provided in box 14.1.<br />

When the 2005/06 budget was prepared, the MPERs were integrated<br />

into the MTEF process. However, problems of coordination of timetables<br />

between the MPER <strong>and</strong> MTEF process remained. Some SWGs (see later<br />

discussion) reverted to asking ministries to prepare input papers for the<br />

SWG process because the MPERs were not completed in time to be used.<br />

Coordination between the Ministry of Finance <strong>and</strong> the Ministry of<br />

Planning <strong>and</strong> National Development is insufficient regarding the function<br />

of different documents. Ministries find themselves having to use scarce<br />

capacity to prepare multiple <strong>and</strong> duplicative documents for the two ministries.<br />

In addition to the MPER, which is in essence a review document,<br />

ministries are required to prepare a monitoring <strong>and</strong> evaluation report on<br />

their progress toward the Investment Programme for the Economic Recovery<br />

Strategy for Wealth <strong>and</strong> Employment Creation (IP-ERS) targets (see box<br />

14.2), a function that the Ministry of Planning <strong>and</strong> National Development

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!