19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Strengthening <strong>Public</strong> Expenditure Management in Africa 415<br />

to be adequately discussed in this volume, but certain considerations are<br />

generally applicable.<br />

Potential <strong>and</strong> risks<br />

First, ICT is a tool, immensely powerful yet essentially no different from a<br />

photocopier or a bulldozer in the sense that the needs <strong>and</strong> requirements of<br />

the users must dictate whether <strong>and</strong> how the ICT tool should be used. For<br />

certain functions, a pencil, a telephone, a face-to-face meeting, or a visit to<br />

the document center is far more effective than computers or the Internet.<br />

This obvious point must be stressed, because governments, consultants, or<br />

donor agencies frequently encourage computerizing anything in sight.<br />

Indeed, some observers have argued that ICT innovation is now largely supply<br />

<strong>and</strong> marketing driven rather than dictated by the needs <strong>and</strong> requirements of<br />

the users. Therefore, assessing realistically the costs of a given ICT change<br />

<strong>and</strong> comparing it with the benefits expected are essential.<br />

Second, neither the ICT “techie” nor the budget manager should work<br />

in isolation from each other. As noted, improvements in effectiveness stem<br />

largely from better rules <strong>and</strong> organization in the entity concerned. On the<br />

one h<strong>and</strong>, to apply advanced ICT to obsolete or inefficient rules <strong>and</strong><br />

processes means in effect to computerize inefficiency. Doing the wrong thing<br />

faster is not progress. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the absence of technical ICT competence<br />

risks either costly mistakes or missed opportunities for dramatic<br />

service improvements.<br />

Third, ICT cannot substitute for good management <strong>and</strong> internal controls.<br />

Indeed, the introduction of computers can give a false illusion of tighter<br />

expenditure control in cases where a large part of the expenditure cycle<br />

occurs in parallel outside the computerized system.<br />

Fourth, faster <strong>and</strong> integrated public financial management information<br />

systems carry correspondingly greater potential risks for the integrity<br />

of the data <strong>and</strong> can even jeopardize the financial management system in its<br />

entirety if developed carelessly <strong>and</strong> without sufficient checks, controls,<br />

security, <strong>and</strong> virus protection. Indeed, the first advice to an African government<br />

moving from a partly manual public accounting <strong>and</strong> recording<br />

system to a fully computerized one should be to keep the manual ledgers<br />

going alongside the new system until the new system is working well <strong>and</strong> is<br />

secure <strong>and</strong> free of risk.<br />

Fifth, ICT can substantially reduce corruption. Nevertheless, although<br />

computer technology does eliminate almost all opportunities for corruption<br />

for those who do not underst<strong>and</strong> fully the new technology, it also opens up<br />

new corruption vistas for those who underst<strong>and</strong> the new systems well

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!