19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Country Case Study: Kenya 491<br />

BOX 14.3 Budget Comprehensiveness <strong>and</strong> the Constituency<br />

Development Fund<br />

The Constituency Development Fund was established by an act of the legislature<br />

to take development projects to the citizens at the grassroots level. The strategy<br />

was conceptualized as complementary to the government’s other development<br />

activities, funded through the recurrent <strong>and</strong> development budgets. The<br />

act, drafted by the legislature when the new government came into power,<br />

stipulates that 2.5 percent of ordinary revenue must be set aside for the fund.<br />

The act stipulates that members of the legislature are responsible for establishing<br />

constituency development committees that will prioritize project<br />

proposals from each constituency. Allocations per constituency are based on<br />

a population poverty index, with each constituency receiving a base allocation<br />

plus a variable portion in line with constituencies’ index scores.<br />

Although allocation of some funds by constituencies to constituency<br />

priorities can have benefits in terms of local participation, accountability, <strong>and</strong><br />

effectiveness, the fund’s link to the legislators may trigger some of the governance<br />

problems associated with poorly managed participatory processes.<br />

Reports have circulated of legislators using the funds as an instrument of local<br />

patronage <strong>and</strong> of local elites capturing decision making regarding use of<br />

funds. Monitoring <strong>and</strong> reporting mechanisms that have been set up centrally<br />

are not functioning well enough to counter these types of problems.<br />

As discussed in the 2005 public expenditure review (Republic of Kenya<br />

2005), the establishment of various special funds by members of the legislature<br />

poses a number of public finance management problems. These funds<br />

are not subject to the same control, reporting, <strong>and</strong> accountability procedures<br />

as spending under the main budget. More significantly, this process fragments<br />

public spending, thereby hindering a comprehensive consideration of all<br />

claims on spending against the complete pool of available funds. In practice,<br />

the projects undertaken are not accounted for in recurrent budget allocations:<br />

when a constituency uses its funds to build a secondary school, no mechanism<br />

exists to ensure that the school is adequately staffed on completion. Of course,<br />

the fund also affects the efficiency of public resource use: the location of<br />

roads, schools, <strong>and</strong> other public infrastructure funded by the Constituency<br />

Development Fund—with a forward effect on the recurrent budget—is not<br />

determined by a consideration of cost <strong>and</strong> benefits across localities <strong>and</strong> of<br />

economies of scale. Although 2.5 percent of ordinary revenue is not a huge<br />

proportion on its face, it grows in significance when taken as a proportion of<br />

spending after interest <strong>and</strong> short-term rigid spending, such as salaries.<br />

In addition, the legislature has called to increase the proportion of ordinary<br />

revenue earmarked for the fund.<br />

Source: Republic of Kenya 2005.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!