19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

364 Matthew Andrews<br />

The 28 indicators used in the PEFA set are titled high-level indicators.<br />

This terminology means that they address quality issues at a fairly broad<br />

level, to allow for st<strong>and</strong>ardization at this level but country-specific variation<br />

in the detailed practices <strong>and</strong> processes. They routinely involve a number of<br />

dimensions. One of the two policy-based budgeting indicators, called multiyear<br />

perspective in fiscal planning, expenditure policy, <strong>and</strong> budgeting, 7 has<br />

four dimensions, for instance: (a) preparation of multiyear fiscal forecasts<br />

<strong>and</strong> functional allocations, (b) scope <strong>and</strong> frequency of debt sustainability<br />

analysis, (c) existence of sector strategies with multiyear costing or recurrent<br />

<strong>and</strong> investment expenditure, <strong>and</strong> (d) links between investment budgets <strong>and</strong><br />

forward expenditure estimates.<br />

Table 11.1 shows how the PEFA framework facilitates analysis of the<br />

individual process areas, with reference to the subindicator known as existence<br />

of sector strategies. Very simply, governments compare their current practices<br />

with the descriptions in the table, identifying whether they score an A, B, C,<br />

or D. The assessment has an obvious theoretical <strong>and</strong> comparative basis—in<br />

this case, the argument that strategies underlying the budget are important<br />

influences on budget quality, are better when fully costed, <strong>and</strong> are better<br />

when covering all spending types <strong>and</strong> when consistent with fiscal forecasts<br />

(costs are identified on the basis of such forecasts, for instance). The assessment<br />

TABLE 11.1 Assessing Performance against the PEFA Indicator for<br />

Existence of <strong>Sector</strong> Strategies<br />

Score<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Type of strategy<br />

Strategies for sectors representing at least 75% of primary expenditure<br />

exist with full costing of recurrent <strong>and</strong> investment expenditure, broadly<br />

consistent with fiscal forecasts.<br />

Statements of sector strategies exist <strong>and</strong> are fully costed, broadly<br />

consistent with fiscal forecasts, for sectors representing 25% to 75% of<br />

primary expenditure.<br />

Statements of sector strategies exist for several major sectors but<br />

are substantially costed only for sectors representing up to 25% of<br />

primary expenditure or costed strategies may cover more sectors but<br />

are inconsistent with aggregate fiscal forecasts.<br />

<strong>Sector</strong> strategies may have been prepared for some sectors, but none<br />

of them have substantially complete costing of investments <strong>and</strong><br />

recurrent expenditure.<br />

Source: PEFA 2006: 27.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!