19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

244 Salvatore Schiavo-Campo<br />

applied to investment expenditures because of the difficulty of halting a<br />

project that is already launched, even when it is noncore. Indeed, depending<br />

on the political interests involved, noncore projects may in practice chase out<br />

core projects. (The preparation of the investment budget is discussed later in<br />

this chapter.)<br />

The Need for a Hard Constraint<br />

Giving a hard expenditure constraint to line ministries from the beginning<br />

of budget preparation favors a shift away from a wish list mentality. As discussed<br />

in detail later in this chapter, annual budget preparation must be<br />

framed within a sound macroeconomic framework <strong>and</strong> should include a<br />

top-down stage, a bottom-up stage, <strong>and</strong> an iteration <strong>and</strong> negotiations stage.<br />

It is at the top-down stage that the hard expenditure constraint, or ceiling,<br />

should be communicated by the ministry of finance to all spending agencies;<br />

it is the most effective way of inducing them to confront the hard choices<br />

early in the process.<br />

Bad Practices in Budget Preparation<br />

The absence of a hard expenditure constraint at the start of the process,<br />

which forces early decisions, will invariably lead to one or more of a number<br />

of dysfunctional practices in budgeting.<br />

Incremental <strong>Budgeting</strong><br />

Life itself is incremental. And so, in large part, is the budget process, which<br />

has to take into account the current context, continuing policies, <strong>and</strong><br />

ongoing programs. Except when a major shock is required, most structural<br />

measures can be implemented only progressively. Carrying out every year<br />

a zero-based budgeting exercise covering all programs would be an expensive<br />

illusion. At the other extreme, instituting a mechanical set of changes<br />

to the previous year’s detailed line-item budget leads to very poor results.<br />

In that scenario, the dialogue between the ministry of finance <strong>and</strong> line<br />

ministries is confined to reviewing the different items <strong>and</strong> to bargaining<br />

cuts or increases, item by item. Discussions focus solely on inputs, without<br />

any reference to results, between a ministry of finance typically uninformed<br />

about sectoral realities <strong>and</strong> a sector ministry in a negotiating<br />

mode. Worse, the negotiation is seen as a zero-sum game <strong>and</strong> is usually not<br />

approached by either party in good faith. Moreover, incremental budgeting

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!