19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Budget Execution 295<br />

provided that accountability is adequate; however, in many anglophone<br />

African countries, accountability at the level of the spending-ministries<br />

has been deficient. Nevertheless, anglophone countries have external<br />

audit arrangements that play a comparatively more important role in the<br />

budget process than is the case in francophone countries. In theory,<br />

supreme audit agencies in anglophone countries provide parliament <strong>and</strong><br />

the public with information on budget execution <strong>and</strong> the integrity of<br />

annual accounts.<br />

Budget Appropriation Management Rules <strong>and</strong> Budget Revisions<br />

This section deals with budget appropriation management rules that cover<br />

the period of the budget, transfers between budget items, <strong>and</strong> sequestration<br />

<strong>and</strong> within-year budget revisions.<br />

Period covered<br />

annual rule. A classic principle of budget management is the annuality<br />

principle, which means that the budget is adopted for one budget year at<br />

a time <strong>and</strong> that appropriations for the current budget year must, in principle,<br />

be used in the course of the year. Therefore, at the end of the year, unused<br />

appropriations are canceled. This principle is aimed both at ensuring fiscal<br />

discipline, by preventing implementation of several budgets at the same time,<br />

<strong>and</strong> at encouraging good expenditure planning.<br />

However, the annual rule can create a rush for spending at the close of<br />

the fiscal year. This spending bulge at the end of the fiscal year can be the result<br />

of prudent purchasing procedures. Nevertheless, the potentially adverse<br />

effects of a strict annual rule are many. The annual rule may encourage line<br />

ministries to make unplanned <strong>and</strong> economically inefficient expenditures at<br />

the end of the year. To avoid such perverse effects, several countries of the<br />

Organisation for Economic Co-operation <strong>and</strong> Development (OECD) have<br />

recently authorized the carryover of a certain percentage of these unspent<br />

appropriations to the next fiscal year.<br />

Systematically authorizing carryover for recurrent expenditures in<br />

developing countries would pose problems regarding expenditure control,<br />

however. If appropriate accounting procedures are not in place, altering<br />

the annual rule can lead to executing two budgets at the same time—<br />

<strong>and</strong> confusion. An eventual alteration of the annual rule for recurrent<br />

expenditures should be considered only in those countries where the budget<br />

preparation process is fully satisfactory. In any case, carryover for operating<br />

expenditures should be limited to a small percentage of appropriations <strong>and</strong><br />

be submitted to the approval of the ministry of finance.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!