19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Primer on Performance <strong>Budgeting</strong> 151<br />

place. No one would seriously suggest shutting down an inefficient health<br />

care system unless better alternatives were available.<br />

In this regard, the Chilean system of performance budgeting offers a<br />

sensible way of using performance information in budgetary decision making.<br />

It does not seek to establish a direct association of budget allocations with<br />

performance measures. Rather, performance information is used in the<br />

budget cycle along with financial <strong>and</strong> other information as a starting point<br />

for discussions with agencies. From these discussions, performance data<br />

have been used to confirm existing allocations or—when results were<br />

poor—various actions have been taken to push agencies to improve<br />

performance (Blöndal <strong>and</strong> Curristine 2004).<br />

Why Pursue Performance <strong>Budgeting</strong>?<br />

Would performance budgeting reform induce some revolutionary changes<br />

in the rigid budgeting business? The extensive literature on performance<br />

budgeting reforms in the past two decades, as explained in the following<br />

paragraphs, suggests that performance budgeting reform can enhance<br />

communication between budget actors, improve public management in<br />

terms of efficiency <strong>and</strong> effectiveness, facilitate more informed budgetary<br />

decision making, <strong>and</strong> achieve high transparency of <strong>and</strong> accountability for<br />

government activities. Current performance budgeting initiatives have been<br />

less successful in terms of changing appropriation levels (Flowers, Kundin,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Brower 1999; Kristensen, Groszyk, <strong>and</strong> Bühler 2002; OECD 2004;<br />

Rivenbark <strong>and</strong> Kelly 2000; Wang 2000). Four important advantages of performance<br />

budgeting have been gleaned from recent experiences:<br />

Enhanced communication between budget actors <strong>and</strong> with citizens. Performance<br />

budgeting clarifies program goals <strong>and</strong> objectives <strong>and</strong> identifies<br />

performance targets, thereby giving agencies <strong>and</strong> employees a better sense<br />

of the expectations for their performance. It helps public managers communicate<br />

more effectively about their activities to the executive, the<br />

legislature, <strong>and</strong> the public. The public’s dem<strong>and</strong> for a government that<br />

does more with less will persist, so an important thrust of current budget<br />

reform efforts is to develop budget presentations that improve communication<br />

between government <strong>and</strong> citizens. In contrast to the traditional<br />

line-item budget, a performance budget—with a description of each<br />

government program, performance measures, <strong>and</strong> budget information—<br />

is accessible to ordinary citizens <strong>and</strong> therefore makes it easier for public

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!