19.04.2014 Views

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Budgeting and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14 Anwar Shah<br />

implement their budgets efficiently. Except under special circumstances,<br />

in-year financial plans must be in line with budget forecasts.<br />

Generally, in African countries, it is particularly important to get the<br />

basics right. To ensure efficient program implementation <strong>and</strong> to keep<br />

expenditure under control, the most pressing needs are to strengthen the<br />

arrangements for reporting, accounting, <strong>and</strong> internal control systems. Cash<br />

management <strong>and</strong> in-year financial planning should be strengthened in most<br />

countries. Reliance on arbitrarily determined cash control systems—notably<br />

on cash budgeting systems—should be reduced through preparation of a<br />

more realistic budget <strong>and</strong> transparent control of commitments.<br />

Strong political willingness to ensure that the budget is implemented<br />

according to the policies adopted by the legislature <strong>and</strong> to ensure that the<br />

existing rules are enforced with rigor will be required to bring about lasting<br />

improvements in the PEM system in Africa.<br />

Stephen B. Peterson, in chapter 10, reviews the experience with automated<br />

public financial management systems. The principal recommendation<br />

to developing countries for automating their financial systems is to adopt<br />

off-the-shelf integrated financial management information systems<br />

(IFMISs). Experience shows that these systems usually fail or underperform,<br />

yet research to date has not adequately explained their poor performance.<br />

Peterson presents two frameworks <strong>and</strong> a case study from Ethiopia that<br />

illustrates an approach to automation that has worked. The first framework<br />

distinguishes between business process innovation (reengineering) <strong>and</strong><br />

process change. Process innovation is a comprehensive change of procedures<br />

<strong>and</strong> organization, driven by information technology. Process change is an<br />

incremental strategy, driven by procedural reform <strong>and</strong> supported by<br />

information technology. Process change is far less risky than process innovation.<br />

The conventional off-the-shelf IFMIS reform is principally process<br />

innovation, <strong>and</strong> it exceeds the capacity of most public bureaucracies in<br />

developing countries. Process innovation is appropriate because the<br />

financial systems in most developing countries are relatively sound <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

provide a basis for improvement.<br />

The second framework concerns the three factors of risk to an automation<br />

project: scope, schedule, <strong>and</strong> budget. The availability of concessionary aid to<br />

many developing countries means there is not a hard budget constraint;<br />

consequently, schedule <strong>and</strong> scope slip. The virtual absence of a financial <strong>and</strong><br />

social cost-benefit analysis of these large <strong>and</strong> questionable investments is a<br />

serious failing in the use of development assistance <strong>and</strong> loans.<br />

Finally, the custom IFMIS developed to support the Ethiopian reform<br />

is presented as an example of a successful low-risk strategy of automation in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!