26.04.2015 Views

Founders at Work.pdf

Founders at Work.pdf

Founders at Work.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

96 <strong>Founders</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>Work</strong><br />

Livingston: Wh<strong>at</strong> went wrong?<br />

Kapor: A number of things went wrong or almost went wrong. I almost ran out<br />

of money. Lotus 1-2-3 wasn’t the only idea th<strong>at</strong> we had. I had done this thing<br />

with some other people called Executive Briefing System for the Apple II th<strong>at</strong><br />

was like a precursor to PowerPoint. We did some other projects; I had hired<br />

another group of people and basically had spent down the $300,000 th<strong>at</strong> I’d<br />

alloc<strong>at</strong>ed. It was almost gone and we were nowhere near product, because of<br />

doing all these other things and not having done this before.<br />

I had $600,000 after taxes and paying my partner, and I divided it into two<br />

piles. I took half and said I’m going to buy a house. It was $89,000, the least<br />

expensive house in Cambridge—this was in 1981. I said th<strong>at</strong> I could live on<br />

$40,000 for <strong>at</strong> least 5 years. So I had the other $300,000 th<strong>at</strong> was my own seed<br />

money, but I almost ran out.<br />

I got lucky in th<strong>at</strong> Ben Rosen <strong>at</strong> Sevin Rosen decided to invest. He was the<br />

only VC th<strong>at</strong> I pitched (I didn’t understand anything about venture capital).<br />

And th<strong>at</strong> was fortun<strong>at</strong>e, because without him, I don’t know wh<strong>at</strong> we would have<br />

done.<br />

Most of my mistakes came after we launched the product, not before—after<br />

we started shipping in January of ’83. I had no significant experience in building<br />

an organiz<strong>at</strong>ion or building a management team. And I intuitively did well<br />

when I was leading the whole team, but once we got past 25 people, you can’t<br />

do th<strong>at</strong>. And so I made a series of classic mistakes in hiring. And not building a<br />

good middle management structure. And not recruiting a board th<strong>at</strong> could help<br />

me build the company. Big mistakes in picking a successor, big mistakes in having<br />

an undisciplined product str<strong>at</strong>egy—I was much more interested in having<br />

distinctive, innov<strong>at</strong>ive products and thinking about wh<strong>at</strong> would make sense for<br />

a product line for our business overall—and big mistakes in expanding too fast<br />

and not having discipline about wh<strong>at</strong> we were doing. So I give myself a C or C–<br />

on all th<strong>at</strong> stuff.<br />

Livingston: You guys grew to 1,000 employees before you went public. Did you<br />

know you were going to go public when you started?<br />

Kapor: I didn’t know when, but this was wh<strong>at</strong> I’d learned from my time in<br />

Silicon Valley. To be honest, here’s wh<strong>at</strong> I was driven by: I wanted to do really a<br />

gre<strong>at</strong> product. Almost from day one I understood th<strong>at</strong> I was passion<strong>at</strong>e about<br />

the applic<strong>at</strong>ions themselves, th<strong>at</strong> they’d be integr<strong>at</strong>ed, easier to use and be<br />

powerful. They’d help make people more productive and I cared a lot about<br />

th<strong>at</strong>. The other thing I wanted was financial independence. I had an enormous<br />

desire not to be dependent on other people, or to have to have a job. I wanted<br />

to dict<strong>at</strong>e the terms. So I knew if you had an IPO, then you had a liquid currency<br />

and you had the ability to cash in and get th<strong>at</strong>.<br />

So I actually pushed for an early IPO, which we did successfully. But th<strong>at</strong><br />

brought all the usual problems. The main problem we had as a very young public<br />

company was th<strong>at</strong> people did not understand the industry or its dynamics<br />

and therefore they consistently misvalued the stock and misunderstood wh<strong>at</strong> it<br />

was about. Because it was new and it was different. Eventually, people figured<br />

it out, but I was very imp<strong>at</strong>ient.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!