26.04.2015 Views

Founders at Work.pdf

Founders at Work.pdf

Founders at Work.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Livingston: Did you have any competitors <strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> point?<br />

Ron Gruner 439<br />

Gruner: We had one competitor th<strong>at</strong> wasn’t using quite the same technology,<br />

but had moved into our same market, had identified the same opportunity, and<br />

th<strong>at</strong> was Convex Computer in Dallas, Texas. They took a completely different<br />

str<strong>at</strong>egy. The leading supercomputer <strong>at</strong> the time was Cray Research, and they<br />

said, “We’re going to build a computer th<strong>at</strong>’s comp<strong>at</strong>ible with the Cray.” It’s<br />

ironic in th<strong>at</strong> the lead architect on th<strong>at</strong> project was Steve Wallach, who was the<br />

architect of the Eagle computer <strong>at</strong> D<strong>at</strong>a General.<br />

The Eagle computer was absolutely comp<strong>at</strong>ible with the Eclipse computer,<br />

which I had designed <strong>at</strong> D<strong>at</strong>a General. He built the Eagle to be comp<strong>at</strong>ible<br />

with Eclipse and was very successful. He took th<strong>at</strong> same str<strong>at</strong>egy and did it <strong>at</strong><br />

Convex. We took a str<strong>at</strong>egy of saying, “Let’s pioneer parallel processing technology.”<br />

They were somewh<strong>at</strong> different str<strong>at</strong>egies in different approaches, but<br />

we were in a horse race with them and they with us.<br />

We announced the product in the summer of 1985, and it was very successful<br />

for about 5 years after th<strong>at</strong>.<br />

Livingston: Do you remember any stories about the things th<strong>at</strong> went wrong?<br />

Times you thought you were dead?<br />

Gruner: At Alliant, we had dozens of people working and we had lots of money,<br />

so once we got past where we could take a program from a Vax and run it on our<br />

computer, we weren’t too concerned th<strong>at</strong> there was some bullet th<strong>at</strong> could put<br />

us out of business.<br />

We had done enough work with the marketplace. We had a number of key<br />

customers lined up: Bell Labs is an example. The University of Illinois was<br />

going to use our computers in their future research projects. So we could see,<br />

even in early ’85, $10 million of business lined up, and, if we could deliver the<br />

computers, we’d be in good shape. The scares th<strong>at</strong> I had in my career came <strong>at</strong><br />

Shareholder.com.<br />

Livingston: OK. Let’s jump ahead to Shareholder.com.<br />

Gruner: Shareholder.com was a whole different kind of thing, because the first<br />

few years there were only three or four people, including myself. We were<br />

delivering news for public companies th<strong>at</strong> was very visible, under scrutiny. If<br />

you screwed up, either by being l<strong>at</strong>e or by getting the wrong inform<strong>at</strong>ion, you<br />

were in big trouble. We had a couple of things th<strong>at</strong> scared me to de<strong>at</strong>h.<br />

I think the one th<strong>at</strong> was probably scariest, th<strong>at</strong> definitely could have put us<br />

out of business, happened in ’94 or ’95. A very large pharmaceutical company<br />

had decided to go with us. We had everything underway, and they were going to<br />

announce this new service on their annual report. Everything is fine except th<strong>at</strong><br />

I get a call one afternoon saying, “Ron, we’ve got a really serious problem. The<br />

annual report has come out and it’s got the wrong 800 number on it!”<br />

They were frantic. There were two issues: one, they had printed over a million<br />

annual reports loaded on pallets <strong>at</strong> the facility, and two, they had a legal<br />

requirement to distribute the reports 30 days before the annual meeting. The<br />

reports and the proxies had to be in the shareholders’ hands <strong>at</strong> least 30 days

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!