26.04.2015 Views

Founders at Work.pdf

Founders at Work.pdf

Founders at Work.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ron Gruner 429<br />

Gruner: They said “Fine.” Wh<strong>at</strong> they thought, I don’t know. But we did go<br />

back to them about 4 months l<strong>at</strong>er, when we had a first draft of the business<br />

plan done. We worked very hard on th<strong>at</strong> plan and then went out to San<br />

Francisco and pitched the idea to them. This was John Doerr. He had been<br />

there a few years <strong>at</strong> the time, but he was just really getting started in his career.<br />

Frank Caufield, Brook Byers, and Tom Perkins—th<strong>at</strong> whole crew.<br />

They liked the idea because they could draw analogies with Tandem<br />

Computer. They looked <strong>at</strong> our backgrounds, having been in the business, etc.<br />

So we were able to raise money from Kleiner Perkins. The first round, as I<br />

recall, was about $4.7 million, and back in those days, th<strong>at</strong> was a lot of money<br />

for a first round of financing.<br />

They then introduced us to Hambrecht & Quist—Bill Hambrecht—and<br />

Venrock, which was the venture management arm of the Rockefeller family—<br />

Peter Crisp in New York City. We were able to put together th<strong>at</strong> consortium of<br />

three VCs in about 3 months.<br />

We closed in early October of 1982 and set up the board. Tom Perkins came<br />

on the board. Bill Hambrecht did not, but he liked to be able to observe. It all<br />

worked pretty well. We raised three additional rounds with those investors for a<br />

total of about $30 million.<br />

We kept it to those three investors, or some subset of those. As the game<br />

moved on, Hambrecht & Quist, being an investment banking house and,<br />

frankly, hoping to take us public someday, stepped up and took a larger share<br />

than Kleiner Perkins did, but they were all substantial investors.<br />

We announced the initial product in the summer of 1985.<br />

Livingston: Three years l<strong>at</strong>er?<br />

Gruner: Yes. It took 3 years. We got financing in the fall of ’82. It took 2 1/2 years<br />

to hire a development staff, design the computer, develop the software, and<br />

announce it. We shipped initial systems, which were not beta systems but were<br />

really production systems, in September of ’85. So it was approaching 3 years. It<br />

was a complex task. And th<strong>at</strong> consumed the better part of $30 million.<br />

The first year we did approaching $5 million dollars in revenue. Then the<br />

next year, in ’86, we did about $30 million in revenue.<br />

Livingston: Th<strong>at</strong>’s impressive.<br />

Gruner: Because it was hardware. We went public in December of ’86.<br />

Morgan Stanley and Hambrecht & Quist took us public.<br />

Th<strong>at</strong> was a very positive experience. We found a lot of plain, simple wisdom<br />

from some of the venture capitalists we had—particularly Tom Perkins. Tom<br />

was on our board. Even <strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> point he was quite wealthy, very successful. And<br />

he made almost every single board meeting. He had to make them in Boston by<br />

taking a red-eye from San Francisco to Boston, coming into a meeting <strong>at</strong>, say,<br />

9:30 in the morning, going to a 4- to 5-hour typically boring board meeting,<br />

then flying back th<strong>at</strong> night. And he was in his early 50s <strong>at</strong> th<strong>at</strong> time. He always<br />

had gre<strong>at</strong> insights, and always tinged with a nice touch of humor, too.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!