26.04.2015 Views

Founders at Work.pdf

Founders at Work.pdf

Founders at Work.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

224 <strong>Founders</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>Work</strong><br />

with 20,000 links. I couldn’t find anything in th<strong>at</strong> file anymore, so I started putting<br />

in notes. I’d put the URL, a space, a hash mark, and then a word or two<br />

describing it. I think the first one was “m<strong>at</strong>h,” so I could grep out all the things<br />

th<strong>at</strong> were #m<strong>at</strong>h and get all my items marked as m<strong>at</strong>h. In some sense, these<br />

were the first tags.<br />

After a while, I couldn’t really do this, so I built a sort of next gener<strong>at</strong>ion of<br />

th<strong>at</strong> text file, which was called Muxway, in 2001. It was a lot like del.icio.us.<br />

There was a bookmarklet; you saved things; you could describe and tag them. It<br />

was single-player—no one else could use it—but the actual website was visible<br />

to other people. I discovered over time th<strong>at</strong> people were subscribing to my<br />

bookmarks. There were some 10,000 daily readers looking <strong>at</strong> my stuff. Th<strong>at</strong> was<br />

interesting.<br />

I did several other projects along the way. I did GeoURL. Something called<br />

Reversible, th<strong>at</strong> is long gone. Reversible was also like del.icio.us in many ways,<br />

but different in a few key ways th<strong>at</strong> made it fail.<br />

In l<strong>at</strong>e 2003, I started working on del.icio.us, which is a multiplayer version.<br />

I was actually trying to come up with a better Memepool—something between<br />

Muxway and Memepool which was more vital somehow, and we ended up with<br />

del.icio.us. I had it partially done for the first Foo Camp. I’d been invited to<br />

Foo Camp for GeoURL, and I had stuff to show for del.icio.us, but I didn’t<br />

show anyone. I chickened out because I was embarrassed <strong>at</strong> the st<strong>at</strong>e of the<br />

thing. So people were using it then, but it was more generally released l<strong>at</strong>er—I<br />

think toward December of 2003.<br />

Through 2004, I kept working on it and started to get press and lots of users.<br />

By the end of 2004, I had 30,000 users.<br />

Livingston: How were the users finding out about it?<br />

Schachter: People were telling each other about it.<br />

Livingston: You were <strong>at</strong> Morgan Stanley this whole time, right? Wh<strong>at</strong> were you<br />

doing there?<br />

Schachter: I was doing d<strong>at</strong>a mining and proprietary trading algorithms.<br />

Livingston: Why did you choose not to focus full-time on del.icio.us and wh<strong>at</strong><br />

finally tipped the scale?<br />

Schachter: The economics didn’t make sense. It still made sense to keep the<br />

day job. But in l<strong>at</strong>e 2004/early 2005, my group <strong>at</strong> Morgan Stanley began to<br />

come apart. There were a bunch of people leaving, so it was a n<strong>at</strong>ural time<br />

to leave. It was a “Should I find a new job elsewhere?” kind of thing.<br />

Livingston: When you were doing this in your spare time, did you ever say,<br />

“Ugh. This is too much work”?<br />

Schachter: Not really. I was always very careful (not anymore, because the guys<br />

th<strong>at</strong> I work with are better programmers) to structure the code—each chunk of<br />

code wasn’t larger than the screen—such th<strong>at</strong> I could come in and look <strong>at</strong> it, figure<br />

out wh<strong>at</strong> I’m doing, do it, and be done for the day in 15 minutes. So if I<br />

could get one thing done a day, I was happy. A lot of stuff, if I could spend more

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!