13.07.2015 Views

Feasibility Study and Technical Report - Pretivm

Feasibility Study and Technical Report - Pretivm

Feasibility Study and Technical Report - Pretivm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• This estimate does not contain permitting costs or other development costs.Additionally, costs for management <strong>and</strong> engineering are based on an engineerprocure-contract(EPC) delivery model.• The clearing estimate is based on the following parameters: a 30 m wide right-of-way <strong>and</strong> average clearing width, with tree sizes <strong>and</strong>st<strong>and</strong> density as observed during aerial reconnaissance of the proposedroute very limited new <strong>and</strong> upgraded road, as almost all of the towers will beplaced with helicopters clearing along forested portions of the route, to be confirmed by forestengineering as part of detailed cost estimate; this estimate also assumesthat the felled trees will be left in place with some bucking <strong>and</strong> limbing, asthey are small <strong>and</strong> likely not merchantable. these costs also assume that <strong>Pretivm</strong> will provide access (or permits foraccess) along the road to the Gr<strong>and</strong>uc Mine <strong>and</strong> the use of the tide stagingarea prior to line construction mobilization.• Foundation conditions were estimated based on 30% soil, <strong>and</strong> 70% rock. Thefoundation estimates also include four specialized foundations for the longerspans across the snowfields south of the Knipple Glacier.• Transmission structure assumptions include the assumption that single steelpoles will be placed on suitable bedrock foundations for virtually the entiretransmission line route.• Helicopter stringing support will be along the entire route.• Note that this estimate assumes construction over two field seasons, as per theproposed construction schedule. In the event the Project schedule stretchesover a longer period of time, or compressing of the schedule is necessary due todelayed construction start, increased costs are likely compared to the costs inthe estimate.For the operation <strong>and</strong> maintenance costs, Valard estimated the annual costs for activitiescommonly included as part of transmission line operations <strong>and</strong> maintenance for linescomparable to the Brucejack Transmission Line. These include aerial inspections on anannual basis (including thermal imaging every second year), detailed ground inspectionsevery four years, <strong>and</strong> some vegetation management. The operation <strong>and</strong> maintenancecosts will also need to include an active snow avalanche control program for the slopesabove the transmission line.18.8 ANCILLARY SURFACE FACILITIES18.8.1 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BASISThe architectural design criteria outlines the cost estimation parameters of structures<strong>and</strong> facilities for the Project. The ancillary facilities design used pre-engineered <strong>and</strong>Pretium Resources Inc. 18-28 1291990200-REP-R0012-02<strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Report</strong> on the BrucejackProject, Stewart, BC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!