13.07.2015 Views

Feasibility Study and Technical Report - Pretivm

Feasibility Study and Technical Report - Pretivm

Feasibility Study and Technical Report - Pretivm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

There may be opportunities to optimize the underground development design <strong>and</strong>schedule. Further geotechnical <strong>and</strong> hydrogeological studies will better define groundcontrol <strong>and</strong> dewatering requirements.The study should be advanced to the detail design <strong>and</strong> construction stage.25.4 PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE25.4.1 AVALANCHE HAZARD ASSESSMENTAn avalanche hazard assessment was completed for the Project. Facilities <strong>and</strong> accessroutes are exposed to approximately 15 paths or areas. Avalanche magnitude variesbetween Size 2 <strong>and</strong> 4, <strong>and</strong> frequency varies between annual <strong>and</strong> 1:100 years. Potentialconsequences of avalanches reaching the Brucejack mine facilities, transmission line,worksites, <strong>and</strong> roads include damage to infrastructure, worker injury (or fatality), <strong>and</strong>project delays. Potential consequences of static snow loads on transmission towersinclude damage to towers <strong>and</strong> foundations, <strong>and</strong> potential loss of electrical service to themine. Without mitigation to the effects of avalanches <strong>and</strong> static snow loading, there is ahigh likelihood of some of these consequences affecting operations on an annual basis.Avalanche mitigation for the Project includes location planning in order to avoidplacement of facilities in avalanche hazard areas. For areas where personnel <strong>and</strong>infrastructure may be exposed, an avalanche management program will be implementedfor mine operations during avalanche season (October through June). The program willutilize an Avalanche Technician team to determine periods of elevated avalanche hazard<strong>and</strong> provide recommendations for closures of hazard areas. The options for reducingcontrol include explosive control, or waiting for natural settlement. Areas that areexpected to have increased frequency of hazard <strong>and</strong> consequences will be evaluated forthe installation of the RACS in order to allow for avalanche explosive control duringreduced visibility (darkness <strong>and</strong> during storms). An allowance has been made in thecapital <strong>and</strong> operating cost estimates for six RACSs.25.4.2 TRANSMISSION LINEValard reviewed potential routes <strong>and</strong> developed an initial design for the transmission lineto the Project site. Based on Valard’s considerable experience in construction oftransmission lines, as well as the experience gained from the two significant transmissionprojects very near the Project site, Valard identified a transmission line route from LLHnorthwards up the Salmon Valley to the Knipple Glacier, <strong>and</strong> then high on the slopesabove the glacier to the Project site. Based on this route, Valard has the followinginterpretations <strong>and</strong> conclusions:• The preferred route for the transmission line is along the moderate slopes onthe west side of the Salmon Glacier valley. These slopes have exposed or nearsurface bedrock along most of the route, along with short <strong>and</strong> sparse tree cover.No harvesting activities exist in the area.Pretium Resources Inc. 25-2 1291990200-REP-R0012-02<strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Report</strong> on the BrucejackProject, Stewart, BC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!