Características generales del diseño

Evaluación de artículos de investigación 193Friedland DJ (editor). Evidence-based medicine: A framework for clinical practice.Stamford, Appleton & Lange, 1998.Gehlbach SH. Interpreting the medical literature. 3rd edition. Nueva York, McGraw-HillInc., 1993.Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine. Londres,BMJ Books, 1997: 53.Lock S. Foreword. En: Hawkins C, Sorgi M, eds. Research: how to plan, speak andwrite about it. Berlín, Springer-Verlag, 1985: vii.McAlister FA, Straus SE, Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, for the Evidence-based MedicineWorking Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature XX. Integrating research evidencewith the care of the individual patient. Journal of the American Medical Association,2000, 283: 2829–2836.Rosenberg LE. Exceptional economic returns on investments in medical research.Medical Journal of Australia, 2002, 177: 368–371.Sustaining the strength of the UK in healthcare and life sciences R&D: Competition,cooperation and cultural change. A report on the third SmithKline Beecham R&DPolicy Symposium. Oxted, ScienceBridge, 1996: 12.Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-basedmedicine: how to practice and teach EBM, 2nd edition. Edimburgo, Nueva York, ChurchillLivingstone, 2000.Seglen P.O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.British Medical Journal, 1997, 314: 497.U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services: An assessmentof the effectiveness of 169 interventions. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1989.Wellcome Trust and National Health Service Executive. Putting NHS research on themap: an analysis of scientific publications in England 1990–1997. Londres, The WellcomeTrust, 2001. (http://www.wellcome.ac.uk. consultado el 30/3/2004).World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research, 2002.The WHO Reproductive Health Library, N.º 5 [CD-ROM]. Ginebra (WHO/RHR/02.1).