12.12.2012 Views

characterization, modeling, and design of esd protection circuits

characterization, modeling, and design of esd protection circuits

characterization, modeling, and design of esd protection circuits

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.1. Calibration Procedure 117<br />

simulated. Such simulations were performed, but the results <strong>of</strong> these simulations are not<br />

given until Section 4.3.<br />

Mixed-mode simulations (Section 3.3) were used to model the TLP circuit shown in Fig.<br />

2.14b, using a lumped 50Ω resistor between the square-wave voltage source <strong>and</strong> the drain<br />

<strong>of</strong> the MOSFET (to simulate the transmission-line impedance) <strong>and</strong> a 50Ω shunt resistor<br />

connected at the drain. Since the 100µm-wide test structures are robust enough that no<br />

additional series resistance (Rs ) is needed in the TLP circuit, this resistance was left out <strong>of</strong><br />

the test setup <strong>and</strong> simulations. The rise time <strong>of</strong> the simulated square wave was set to 3ns,<br />

the average rise time <strong>of</strong> the pulse in the TLP setup. Just as in the experimental setup, each<br />

simulated TLP pulse width used to stress a structure has a unique height which will trigger<br />

second breakdown. Thus, multiple simulations with different pulse heights must be run to<br />

define a Pf vs. tf curve. Since the exact relationship between the input pulse height <strong>and</strong> the<br />

time to failure is not known, the simulated square pulses are simply given very large<br />

widths <strong>and</strong> a simulation is discontinued when failure is reached (determination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

failure condition is discussed below).<br />

As a starting point for determining the thermal boundary conditions, thermal electrodes<br />

were placed coincident with the source, drain, gate, <strong>and</strong> substrate contacts just as they<br />

were for the dc snapback simulations. This configuration implies that no heat transfer<br />

occurs through the sides <strong>of</strong> the structure or the non-contacted areas on the top <strong>of</strong> the<br />

structure. In the real structures, the substrate electrical contact is on the surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />

source-side <strong>of</strong> the device, outside the defined simulation space. Therefore, the thermal<br />

electrode overlapping the substrate contact along the bottom <strong>of</strong> the structure is not meant<br />

to model the heat sink <strong>of</strong> the substrate contact itself but rather the heat sink <strong>of</strong> the entire<br />

silicon substrate. As discussed in Section 3.1, by applying a lumped thermal resistance<br />

<strong>and</strong> capacitance to the substrate thermal contact, the contact can be made to approximate<br />

the thermal mass <strong>of</strong> the entire substrate. In simulations <strong>of</strong> very short ESD pulses, the<br />

thermal boundary conditions are not important because the heating is very localized.<br />

However, for longer stress times the high-temperature region extends a greater distance<br />

<strong>and</strong> the thermal boundary conditions become more important.<br />

In the initial transient simulations, a lumped thermal resistance <strong>of</strong> 10,000 K/W (a value<br />

loosely based on a calculation by Diaz [24]) was placed on the substrate contact, <strong>and</strong> in<br />

order to simplify the simulations no thermal capacitance was used. For simulations with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!