05.07.2013 Views

BSA Flow Software Installation and User's Guide - CSI

BSA Flow Software Installation and User's Guide - CSI

BSA Flow Software Installation and User's Guide - CSI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Integral time-scale τI<br />

Definition of the spectrum<br />

2<br />

{ () }<br />

R( 0)<br />

= E u t<br />

(7-59)<br />

The autocorrelation function can be interpreted as a measure of how well<br />

future values of the data can be predicted from past observations. As you<br />

might expect from this, R(τ) normally decrease with increasing lag time τ, as<br />

does the autocovariance C(τ). The autocovariance generally approach 0 for<br />

τ → ∞, whereas the autocorrelation approach (E{u})2.<br />

The crosscorrelation can be interpreted similarly, but unlike the<br />

autocorrelation it is not symmetrical around τ=0. This is easily understood<br />

from a simple example:<br />

Imagine crosscorrelation between inlet pressure <strong>and</strong> outlet velocity measured<br />

on a length of pipe. Fluctuations in the inlet pressure will cause changes in<br />

the outlet velocity, but there is a small delay, which can easily be calculated<br />

from the speed of sound (c) <strong>and</strong> the length of the pipe (L). This will produce<br />

a peak in the crosscorrelation at lag time τ=L/c, indicating that to some<br />

extent future outlet velocities can be predicted from current inlet pressure.<br />

If the crosscorrelation function was symmetrical, this would indicate, that<br />

also future inlet pressure could be predicted from present outlet velocity,<br />

which of course is impossible.<br />

In the literature, the integral time-scale τI is usually defined on the basis of<br />

autocorrelation R(τ), but this correlation is calculated from the fluctuating<br />

part of the measured quantity, meaning that the mean-value has been<br />

subtracted. Strictly speaking this is not correlation but covariance as<br />

explained on page 7-122, so a more correct definition of the integral timescale<br />

is based on autocovariance Cuu(τ):<br />

τ<br />

I<br />

=<br />

∞<br />

∫<br />

0<br />

C<br />

C<br />

uu<br />

uu<br />

( τ)<br />

dτ<br />

( 0)<br />

(7-60)<br />

The integral time-scale τI is a rough measure of the longest connections in<br />

the turbulent behaviour. Events more than 2 integral time scales apart, can be<br />

considered independent.<br />

The spectral density Suv(f) <strong>and</strong> the correlation Ruv(τ) form a Fourier<br />

transform pair, defining the spectral density function:<br />

∞<br />

−i2πf<br />

τ<br />

Suv( f) = ∫ Ruv( τ) e dτ<br />

−∞<br />

∞<br />

∫<br />

R ( τ)<br />

= S ( f) e<br />

uv uv<br />

−∞<br />

i2πf τ<br />

(Fourier transform) (7-61)<br />

df (Inverse Fourier transform) (7-62)<br />

Auto- & Cross-spectra Suv(f) is called cross-spectral density or simply cross-spectrum when u(t)<br />

<strong>and</strong> v(t) represent two independent measurements, <strong>and</strong> auto-spectral density<br />

when u(t) <strong>and</strong> v(t) represent the same physical quantity. In the latter case the<br />

symbol S(f) is often used instead of Suu(f), <strong>and</strong> the auto-spectral density<br />

function is frequently referred to as power spectral density (PSD), power<br />

spectrum, or simply the spectrum.<br />

<strong>BSA</strong> <strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Software</strong>:Reference guide 7-123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!