05.07.2013 Views

BSA Flow Software Installation and User's Guide - CSI

BSA Flow Software Installation and User's Guide - CSI

BSA Flow Software Installation and User's Guide - CSI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Estimator smoothing<br />

As explained above the frequency resolution ∆f of the calculated spectrum<br />

depend on the duration T of the sampling period. Consequently the<br />

additional information acquired increasing T is used solely to produce<br />

spectrum estimates at a higher number of discrete frequencies rather than<br />

reducing the variance of any one particular spectrum estimate.<br />

Analysis of LDA-measurements is based on discrete velocity samples, <strong>and</strong><br />

you might attempt to reduce the estimator variance by increasing the sample<br />

rate, producing more samples within the same finite sampling period T.<br />

Unfortunately this will not improve things either: According to the Nyquist<br />

sampling criterion you will not be able to estimate the spectrum at<br />

frequencies above half the sampling rate. The additional information<br />

acquired increasing the sample rate will be used to produce additional<br />

spectrum estimates at higher frequencies, <strong>and</strong> again this does not reduce the<br />

variance of any one particular spectrum estimate.<br />

In practice, the r<strong>and</strong>om errors of an estimate produced by (7-75) can be<br />

reduced by smoothing the estimated spectrum.<br />

–There are two ways of doing this:<br />

• Ensemble smoothing: Averaging over an ensemble of estimates.<br />

• Frequency smoothing: Averaging over neighboring frequencies.<br />

Ensemble smoothing Ensemble smoothing is implemented by splitting the raw data into blocks of<br />

equal duration. A separate spectrum estimate is calculated for each block,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the final estimate is determined as the average of the calculated spectra:<br />

i= q<br />

S$ 1<br />

f $ ∑ q<br />

( ) = S′ ( f)<br />

uv uv, i<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

(7-76)<br />

- where S’(f) is introduced to distinguish the raw <strong>and</strong> the smoothed estimate.<br />

This will reduce the variance of the estimator by a factor q, where q is the<br />

number of blocks used in the calculation. Consequently the st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

deviation <strong>and</strong> thus the normalized st<strong>and</strong>ard error is reduced by a factor √q:<br />

ε<br />

r<br />

[ S$ uv(<br />

f)<br />

]<br />

( )<br />

σ 1<br />

≡ =<br />

(7-77)<br />

S f q<br />

uv<br />

Since the duration of each block is only a fraction of the total sampling<br />

period, the method has the drawback of reducing the frequency resolution of<br />

the calculated spectrum. With a direct estimate based on Fourier transform of<br />

the entire sampling period T the frequency resolution becomes ∆f=1/T, while<br />

ensemble averaging reduces resolution to ∆f=q/T.<br />

Apart from reducing estimator variance, the ensemble averaging will also<br />

reduce calculation time slightly, since a separate Fourier transform of several<br />

smaller blocks is faster than calculating the Fourier transform of one large<br />

block.<br />

Frequency smoothing Frequency smoothing is done by averaging together the results for l<br />

neighboring spectral components in the estimate based on Fourier transform<br />

of the entire sampling period:<br />

( l )<br />

j=<br />

−1<br />

2<br />

1<br />

( ) ∑ ( + )<br />

S$ $<br />

uv fi= S′ uv fij<br />

l= 135 , , , K<br />

l<br />

( l)<br />

j=<br />

1− 2<br />

(7-78)<br />

7-132 <strong>BSA</strong> <strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Software</strong>: Reference guide

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!